Cited by 11Physical Activity and HealthSleep and Work-Related FatigueMind wandering and attention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of physical activity breaks on cognitive function in undergraduate students: a pilot study

Open access
Pastor-Vicedo, Juan Carlos, León, María Pilar, González-Fernández, Francisco Tomás, Prieto-Ayuso, Alejandro·2024·Cogent Social Sciences

Abstract

Physical activity is known to have several cognitive benefits. As a result, many teachers introduce short bouts of physical activity (active breaks) during their lessons. However, active breaks are less common in the university context, where students tend to remain passive during lessons. Therefore, there is a paucity of literature on active breaks and their benefits for undergraduate students. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a 10-min active break at moderate intensity on vigilance in undergraduate students by using a psychomotor vigilance task. Twenty-six undergraduate students (Mage = 23.36, SD = 1.98; 53.8% females) participated in this study and performed two conditions: control condition (passive condition) and experimental condition (active break). Results revealed that after receiving 10 min of moderate-intensity physical activity, the students improved their attention, as they responded faster to the psychomotor vigilance task than in the control condition. Considering these results, it seems that students can benefit from physical activity breaks by improving their vigilance. However, as this conclusion is based on a pilot study, we should be cautious in interpreting these results. Further research into this finding is needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23311886.2024.2326692

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 . Figure 1. example of one trial of the psychomotor vigilance task (PVt).
Figure 1 . Figure 1. example of one trial of the psychomotor vigilance task (PVt).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 . Figure 2. Schematic representation of the experiment (see text for full description).
Figure 2 . Figure 2. Schematic representation of the experiment (see text for full description).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 . Figure 3. Psychomotor vigilance task. Participants' mean reaction time (±Se) and individual performance as a function of effort condition.
Figure 3 . Figure 3. Psychomotor vigilance task. Participants' mean reaction time (±Se) and individual performance as a function of effort condition.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Acevedo, E. O., & Ekkekakis, P. (2006). Psychobiology of physical activity. Human Kinetics.
  2. American College of Sports Medicine (2010). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  3. 10.2174/1875399X01407010203 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/S0033291709005960 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2165/00007256-200232090-00002 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.024 · DOI
  7. 10.1123/jsep.31.5.640 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chmura, J., Nazar, K., Kaciuba-Uscilko, H., & Pilis, W. (2002). The changes in psychomotor performance during progressive endurance exercise. Journal of Human Kinetics, 7, 3–10. https://johk.pl/?p=1084
  10. Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T. H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic Press.
  11. Davies, R. D., & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. Academic Press.
  12. 10.1080/02640410410001675289 · DOI
  13. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000966 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/sleep/28.9.1059 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00002-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/sms.12310 · DOI
  18. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182305552 · DOI
  19. 10.1123/jpah.2015-0238 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.04.002 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/a0032634 · DOI
  22. Horgan, J. (2003). Lecturing for learning. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 75–90). Routledge Falmer.
  23. 10.1016/j.mhpa.2014.05.002 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/brainsci11060675 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1976.tb00116.x · DOI
  26. Kenney, W. L., Willmore, J. H., & Costill, D. L. (2013). Physiology of sport and exercise. Human Kinetics.
  27. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096224 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1080/02640418808729800 · DOI
  30. Léger, L., & Gadoury, C. (1989). Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict VO2 max in adults. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 14(1), 21–26.
  31. 10.3758/bf03195580 · DOI
  32. 10.1139/apnm-2014-0309 · DOI
  33. 10.5093/psed2020a16 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0963721411429458 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.014 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.07.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/1087054713507974 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.11.002 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00044-3 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01474 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.009 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00134-8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.028 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032279 · DOI
  46. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00723 · DOI
  47. Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Hancock, P. A. (1996). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 183–200). Erlbaum.
  48. 10.1518/001872008X312152 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/001872088202400409 · DOI
  50. 10.1249/00005768-199505000-00024 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/apa.13323 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/87567559909596075 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Pastor-Vicedo, J. C., León, M. P., González-Fernández, F. T., & Prieto-Ayuso, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Didactics of Physical Education, Arts Education and Music, University of Castilla-La Mancha
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
  • Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Granada
Corresponding author
Prieto-Ayuso, Alejandro
Venue
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2024-03-11
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
2331-1886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392661758
Cited by
11
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha
  • ERDF (SBPLY/19/180501/000147)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
physical activity breaks, active breaks, cognitive function, sustained attention, attention, psychomotor vigilance task, undergraduate students, university students, moderate-intensity exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review