The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explainable machine learning for corporate financial distress prediction in Vietnam
Open accessAbstract
Corporate financial distress generates substantial costs for firms and the broader economy, making timely early-warning tools especially important in emerging markets. This study develops an interpretable distress-prediction framework for Vietnamese listed companies by assessing whether modern classifiers outperform a theory-driven logistic benchmark and by identifying economically meaningful risk drivers. Using firm-year data from 2014 to 2024, the analysis combines accounting indicators, market-based signals, and a macroeconomic factor. Models are trained on 2014 to 2021 with time-aware cross-validation and evaluated on 2022 to 2024 using ranking metrics, classification performance, calibration, and Shapley additive explanations. The comparison includes logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine with radial basis function kernel, multilayer perceptron, and extreme gradient boosting. Ensemble models perform best: random forest achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of about 0.946 and a balanced F1 score near 0.74, closely followed by extreme gradient boosting. Explanations show that current operating profitability is the strongest nonlinear driver, with distress risk rising sharply once firms become loss-making. Accumulated profitability, working-capital liquidity, firm size, market valuation, and inflation add further predictive value. The study offers an auditable framework for investors, lenders, managers, and supervisors in Vietnam.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MYERS, S. C. (1984) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x · Cited by 7,526
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.020 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jifm.12053 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984412 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.006 · DOI
- 10.2307/2490171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/260062 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10614-020-10042-0 · DOI
- 10.1145/2939672.2939785 · DOI · Paper page
- Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1702.08608. · arXiv
- 10.1007/978-3-032-06179-9_4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb04949.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.016 · DOI
- 10.22495/cgobrv7i3p8 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:RAST.0000013627.90884.b7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s43621-025-02199-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.043 · DOI · Paper page
- Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 4768–4777). NeurIPS (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems).
- 10.1080/23322039.2025.2489708 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03058.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10479-022-04766-5 · DOI
- 10.1109/IJCNN.1990.137710 · DOI
- 10.2307/2490395 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1080/14765284.2025.2549237 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1086/209665 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-032-10486-1_12 · DOI
- 10.3390/data7110160 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.044 · DOI
- 10.2307/2490859 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Nam, T., & Phan Huy, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Economics and Law and Vietnam National University
- Venue
- Cogent Business & Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-05-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-1975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7161642708
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cogent Business & Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
- Social Sciences › Law › Corporate Insolvency and Governance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- corporate financial distress prediction, early warning systems, explainable machine learning, SHAP, Vietnamese listed firms, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, operating profitability, firm size, market valuation, inflation, emerging markets, risk drivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explainable machine learning for corporate financial distress prediction in Vietnam. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23311975.2026.2670659
- The paper
- Le Nam, T., & Phan Huy, T. (2026). Explainable machine learning for corporate financial distress prediction in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2670659