The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Experience of COVID-19 and Its Impact on Teachers’ Mental Health, Coping, and Teaching
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has placed significant demands on teachers. The current study uses needs assessment data gathered from 454 New Orleans charter school teachers (81% women; 55% Black; 73% regular education) during the first months of the pandemic. On average, teachers experienced seven stressors (out of 18 surveyed) and four protective factors (out of six surveyed). Teachers who experienced more stressors reported worse mental health and found it harder to cope and teach. Experiencing more protective factors was associated with finding it easier to cope and teach. In comparison to White teachers, Black teachers reported better mental health, more protective factors, less of a negative impact of stressors, and more of a positive impact of protective factors. Lack of connection and online teaching challenges were the most difficult aspects of teaching during the pandemic; support from coworkers and administrators were the most helpful. Recommendations to support teachers are discussed.Impact StatementTeachers experienced considerable stress as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which was related to poorer mental health, coping, and teaching. At the same time, teachers reported resiliencies, which were related to better coping and teaching. Supporting teachers’ well-being is critical to prevent significant adverse consequences for teachers, their students, and the education system as a whole.Supplemental data for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1855473.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 · Cited by 12,852
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010) · doi:10.4135/9781506335193 · Cited by 6,215
Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed)
Morse, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(96)00056-6 · Cited by 5,593
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2000) · Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3. · doi:10.1037/10518-046 · Cited by 3,102
Burnout and work engagement among teachers
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001 · Cited by 3,067
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365 · Cited by 2,797
The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192 · Cited by 2,442
Sahu, P. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.7541 · Cited by 2,353
(2022) · Research Methods · doi:10.1142/9789811256943_0011 · Cited by 1,655
Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research
Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016) · HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/1937586715614171 · Cited by 1,423
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, C. N., Peele, H., Daniels, M., Saybe, M., Whalen, K., Overstreet, S., & The New Orleans, T.-I. S. L. C.
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-03-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 491-504
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W3135138400
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 35.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Experience of COVID-19 and Its Impact on Teachers’ Mental Health, Coping, and Teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/2372966x.2020.1855473
- The paper
- Baker, C. N., Peele, H., Daniels, M., Saybe, M., Whalen, K., Overstreet, S., & The New Orleans, T.-I. S. L. C. (2021). The Experience of COVID-19 and Its Impact on Teachers’ Mental Health, Coping, and Teaching. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966x.2020.1855473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.