Cited by 7Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesAdsorption and Cooling SystemsHeat Transfer and Optimization

A comparative study between a two-dimensional numerical minichannel evaporator model and a classical effectiveness–NTU approach under different dehumidifying conditions

Open access
Hassan, Abdelrahman Hussein, Martinez-Ballester, Santiago, Gonzálvez-Maciá, José·2015·Science and Technology for the Built Environment

Abstract

In this article, a two-dimensional numerical model for a minichannel evaporator is implemented. This model takes into account the variation of wall temperature and moist air properties in both longitudinal and transverse directions. The verification of the current model is done with an analytical effectiveness–number of transfer units (ϵ–NTU) approach, and the results of the two approaches show very good agreement and consistency. Different refrigeration and air-conditioning applications have been chosen that represent various inlet conditions to the evaporator. A range of tube temperatures has also been selected to allow different dehumidifying scenarios for the tube and fin. A comparative study is conducted between the current model results and the results of the traditional ϵ–NTU method based on two different models of simultaneous heat and mass transfer. Significant deviations in results between the current model and the traditional ϵ–NTU approach are found, especially in latent heat transfer. These deviations are mainly due to the assumptions that are normally adopted by the ϵ–NTU method and fin theory, such as no variation in moist air temperature and humidity ratio along the direction between tubes, no accounting for partially wet fin conditions, and finally, the assumption of a constant average saturation line slope within a specific evaporator segment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23744731.2015.1028866

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ASHRAE. 2011. ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications, Chapter 3. Atlanta: ASHRAE.
  2. Whitman, W.C., W.M. Johnson, J.A. Tomczyk, and E. Silberstein. 2012. Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Technology, 7th Ed. Chapter 29. New York: Delmar, Cengage Learning.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassan, A. H., Martinez-Ballester, S., & Gonzálvez-Maciá, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
  • Institute for Energy Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, , Spain
Corresponding author
Hassan, Abdelrahman Hussein
Venue
Science and Technology for the Built Environment
Published
2015-07-04
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
681-692
ISSN
  • 1078-9669 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-4731
  • 2374-474X
OpenAlex
W1538031483
Cited by
7
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Science and Technology for the Built Environment (publishedVersion)
  • RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
Keywords
effectiveness-NTU method, two-dimensional numerical model, dehumidification, latent heat transfer, simultaneous heat and mass transfer, air conditioning, refrigeration, wall temperature variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review