Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,107

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 197 of the 197 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory

Open access
Burr, Geoffrey W., Shelby, Robert M., Sebastian, Abu, Kim, Sangbum, Kim, Seyoung, Sidler, Severin, Virwani, Kumar, Ishii, Masatoshi, Narayanan, Pritish, Fumarola, Alessandro, Sanches, Lucas L., Boybat, Irem, Le Gallo, Manuel, Moon, Kibong, Woo, Jiyoo, Hwang, Hyunsang, Leblebici, Yusuf·2017·Advances in Physics: X

Abstract

Dense crossbar arrays of non-volatile memory (NVM) devices represent one possible path for implementing massively-parallel and highly energy-efficient neuromorphic computing systems. We first review recent advances in the application of NVM devices to three computing paradigms: spiking neural networks (SNNs), deep neural networks (DNNs), and ‘Memcomputing’. In SNNs, NVM synaptic connections are updated by a local learning rule such as spike-timing-dependent-plasticity, a computational approach directly inspired by biology. For DNNs, NVM arrays can represent matrices of synaptic weights, implementing the matrix–vector multiplication needed for algorithms such as backpropagation in an analog yet massively-parallel fashion. This approach could provide significant improvements in power and speed compared to GPU-based DNN training, for applications of commercial significance. We then survey recent research in which different types of NVM devices – including phase change memory, conductive-bridging RAM, filamentary and non-filamentary RRAM, and other NVMs – have been proposed, either as a synapse or as a neuron, for use within a neuromorphic computing application. The relevant virtues and limitations of these devices are assessed, in terms of properties such as conductance dynamic range, (non)linearity and (a)symmetry of conductance response, retention, endurance, required switching power, and device variability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585

Cites

197 of 197 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 197 references

Cited by

See all 1,107

Metadata

Authors
Burr, G. W., Shelby, R. M., Sebastian, A., Kim, S., Kim, S., Sidler, S., Virwani, K., Ishii, M., Narayanan, P., Fumarola, A., Sanches, L. L., Boybat, I., Le Gallo, M., Moon, K., Woo, J., Hwang, H., & Leblebici, Y.
Venue
Advances in Physics: X
Published
2016-12-04
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
89-124
ISSN
2374-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560615381
Cited by
1,107
References
197
FWCI
37.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585
The paper
Burr, G. W., Shelby, R. M., Sebastian, A., Kim, S., Kim, S., Sidler, S., Virwani, K., Ishii, M., Narayanan, P., Fumarola, A., Sanches, L. L., Boybat, I., Le Gallo, M., Moon, K., Woo, J., Hwang, H., & Leblebici, Y. (2017). Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory. Advances in Physics: X. https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.