Cited by 44scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationScience, Technology, and Education in Latin America

A multi-scale perspective for assessing publishing circuits in non-hegemonic countries

Open access
Beigel, Fernanda·2021·Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society

Abstract

University Rankings and impact factor indicators were critical in the extension of the global belief in the intrinsic academic value of “World Class Institutions,” along with the international recognition of successful individuals forged through mainstream journals. However, these supposedly global standards were not adopted passively, nor massively, in the so-called periphery. Drawing from quantitative and qualitative studies of evaluative cultures in Latin America, particularly in Argentina, this paper observes various circuits of recognition and different paths for prestige-building. First, it discusses a multi-scale approach to national scientific fields highlighting heterogeneity in terms of the orientation of research agendas and styles of academic publishing. Evaluative cultures are examined as a complex set of instances of legitimation that provide room for maneuvering between global standards and local orders. Second, the paper delves into the role played by Latin America in forging an open access, non-commercial, regional publishing circuit with a dominant, but not exclusive, composition of journals from the social sciences and humanities. Finally, it argue that facing this dynamical publishing ecosystem developed in the public domain, national research assessment systems are alienated by incentives directed only to performance in mainstream publishing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/25729861.2020.1845923

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the example of the Latin American publishing context, Beigel (2021) finds that within the so-called periphery, regional centres emerge.

    “Using the example of the Latin American publishing context, Beigel (2021) finds that within the so-called periphery, regional centres emerge, which calls for closer inspection of publication patterns within regions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beigel, F. 2017. "Peripheral Scientists, between Ariel and Caliban. Institutional Know-how and Circuits of Recognition in Argentina. The 'Career-Best Publications' of the Researchers at CONICET." DADOS -Revista de Ciências Sociais 60 (3): 825-865.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beigel, F.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Beigel, Fernanda
Venue
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2572-9861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133643203
Cited by
44
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tapuya Latin American Science Technology and Society (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2017-2647)
  • UNCuyo (SIIP-UNCUYO 06/F395)
  • CONICET (PIP 2014-0157)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America
Keywords
Latin America, Argentina, university rankings, impact factor, legitimation, multiscale analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review