The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PPARα Agonist-Induced Rodent Tumors: Modes of Action and Human Relevance
Abstract
Widely varied chemicals--including certain herbicides, plasticizers, drugs, and natural products--induce peroxisome proliferation in rodent liver and other tissues. This phenomenon is characterized by increases in the volume density and fatty acid oxidation of these organelles, which contain hydrogen peroxide and fatty acid oxidation systems important in lipid metabolism. Research showing that some peroxisome proliferating chemicals are nongenotoxic animal carcinogens stimulated interest in developing mode of action (MOA) information to understand and explain the human relevance of animal tumors associated with these chemicals. Studies have demonstrated that a nuclear hormone receptor implicated in energy homeostasis, designated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha), is an obligatory factor in peroxisome proliferation in rodent hepatocytes. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the state of the science on several topics critical to evaluating the relationship between the MOA for PPARalpha agonists and the human relevance of related animal tumors. Topics include a review of existing tumor bioassay data, data from animal and human sources relating to the MOA for PPARalpha agonists in several different tissues, and case studies on the potential human relevance of the animal MOA data. The summary of existing bioassay data discloses substantial species differences in response to peroxisome proliferators in vivo, with rodents more responsive than primates. Among the rat and mouse strains tested, both males and females develop tumors in response to exposure to a wide range of chemicals including DEHP and other phthalates, chlorinated paraffins, chlorinated solvents such as trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene, and certain pesticides and hypolipidemic pharmaceuticals. MOA data from three different rodent tissues--rat and mouse liver, rat pancreas, and rat testis--lead to several different postulated MOAs, some beginning with PPARalpha activation as a causal first step. For example, studies in rodent liver identified seven "key events," including three "causal events"--activation of PPARalpha, perturbation of cell proliferation and apoptosis, and selective clonal expansion--and a series of associative events involving peroxisome proliferation, hepatocyte oxidative stress, and Kupffer-cell-mediated events. Similar in-depth analysis for rat Leydig-cell tumors (LCTs) posits one MOA that begins with PPARalpha activation in the liver, but two possible pathways, one secondary to liver induction and the other direct inhibition of testicular testosterone biosynthesis. For this tumor, both proposed pathways involve changes in the metabolism and quantity of related hormones and hormone precursors. Key events in the postulated MOA for the third tumor type, pancreatic acinar-cell tumors (PACTs) in rats, also begin with PPARalpha activation in the liver, followed by changes in bile synthesis and composition. Using the new human relevance framework (HRF) (see companion article), case studies involving PPARalpha-related tumors in each of these three tissues produced a range of outcomes, depending partly on the quality and quantity of MOA data available from laboratory animals and related information from human data sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-Prevention Trial with Gemfibrozil in Middle-Aged Men with Dyslipidemia
Frick, M. H., Elo, O., Haapa, K., Heinonen, O. P., Heinsalmi, P., Helo, P., Huttunen, J. K., Kaitaniemi, P., Koskinen, P., Manninen, V., et al. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198711123172001 · Cited by 3,881 · cited 3×
“No statistically significant differences were found for any class of cancers examined following this relatively brief exposure and follow-up period (Frick et al., 1987).”
BackgroundMethodThe peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is a negative regulator of macrophage activation
Ricote, M., Li, A. C., Willson, T. M., Kelly, C. J., & Glass, C. K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34178 · Cited by 3,525
Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators
Issemann, I., & Green, S. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/347645a0 · Cited by 3,519
Braissant, O., Foufelle, F., Scotto, C., Dauça, M., & Wahli, W. (1996) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.137.1.8536636 · Cited by 2,217
Kliewer, S. A., Sundseth, S. S., Jones, S. A., Brown, P. J., Wisely, G. B., Koble, C. S., Devchand, P., Wahli, W., Willson, T. M., Lenhard, J. M., et al. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.4318 · Cited by 2,164
Forman, B. M., Chen, J., & Evans, R. M. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.4312 · Cited by 2,116
The PPARs: From Orphan Receptors to Drug Discovery
Willson, T. M., Brown, P. J., Sternbach, D. D., & Henke, B. R. (2000) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm990554g · Cited by 1,816
The PPARα–leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control
Devchand, P. R., Keller, H., Peters, J. M., Vazquez, M., Gonzalez, F. J., & Wahli, W. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384039a0 · Cited by 1,345
Self-citationCompound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices
Hansen, K. J., Clemen, L. A., Ellefson, M. E., & Johnson, H. O. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001489z · Cited by 923
Martin, G., Schoonjans, K., Lefebvre, A.-M., Staels, B., & Auwerx, J. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.45.28210 · Cited by 551
Staels, B., Vu-Dac, N., Kosykh, V. A., Saladin, R., Fruchart, J. C., Dallongeville, J., & Auwerx, J. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci117717 · Cited by 410
Fan, C.-Y., Pan, J., Usuda, N., Yeldandi, A. V., Rao, M. S., & Reddy, J. K. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.25.15639 · Cited by 343
Simard, J., Luthy, I., Guay, J., Bélanger, A., & Labrie, F. (1986) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/0303-7207(86)90132-2 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Perfluoroalkyl Acids: A Review of Monitoring and Toxicological Findings
Lau, C., Anitole, K., Hodes, C., Lai, D., Pfahles-Hutchens, A., & Seed, J. (2007) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm128 · Cited by 2,620
Self-citationPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Target Genes
Rakhshandehroo, M., Knoch, B., Müller, M., & Kersten, S. (2010) · PPAR Research · doi:10.1155/2010/612089 · Cited by 1,020
Hauser, R., & Calafat, A. M. (2005) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2004.017590 · Cited by 941
Peroxisomes and oxidative stress
Schrader, M., & Fahimi, H. D. (2006) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.09.006 · Cited by 838
Feige, J. N., Gelman, L., Michalik, L., Desvergne, B., & Wahli, W. (2006) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2005.12.002 · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Klaunig, J. E., Babich, M. A., Baetcke, K. P., Cook, J. C., Corton, J. C., David, R. M., DeLuca, J. G., Lai, D. Y., McKee, R. H., Peters, J. M., Roberts, R. A., & Fenner-Crisp, P. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 655-780
- ISSN
- 0045-6446 (ISSN-L)
- 1040-8444
- 1547-6898
- OpenAlex
- W1988805205
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.