Cited by 322Evaluation of Teaching PracticesStudent Assessment and FeedbackHigher Education Practises and Engagement

The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education. Love me, love my lectures?

Shevlin, Mark, Banyard, Philip, Davies, Mark, Griffiths, Mark·2000·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

Abstract

This paper examines the validity of student evaluation of teaching (SET) in universities. Recent research demonstrates that evaluations can be influenced by factors other than teaching ability such as student characteristics and the physical environment. In this study, it was predicted that students' perception of the lecturer would significantly predict teaching effectiveness ratings. Using an 11-item student rating scale (N = 199), a two-factor confirmatory factor model of teaching effectiveness was specified and estimated using LISREL8; the factors were 'lecturer ability' and 'module attributes'. This initial model was extended to include a factor relating to the students' ratings of the lecturer's charisma. The model was an acceptable description of the data. The charisma factor explained 69% and 37% of the variation in the 'lecturer ability and 'module attributes' factors respectively. These findings suggest that student ratings do not wholly reflect actual teaching effectiveness. It is argued that a central trait exists which influences a student's evaluation of the lecturer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713611436

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M.
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2000-12
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
397-405
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
OpenAlex
W2162643075
Cited by
322
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
student evaluation of teaching, validity, teaching effectiveness, student perceptions, university teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review