Cited by 60Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

GP attitudes to managing drug‐ and alcohol‐dependent patients: a reluctant role

ABOUYANNI, GEORGE, STEVENS, LEONIE J., HARRIS, MARK F., WICKES, WENDY A., RAMAKRISHNA, SMTA S., TA, ENG, KNOWLDEN, SHEILA M·2000·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the experience, confidence and views of GPs in South West Sydney towards managing drug and alcohol dependence and their interest in participating in shared care methadone prescribing. Five hundred and forty‐eight GPs were mailed a self complete questionnaire. Non‐responders were followed‐up by telephone. Seventy‐six per cent of GPs responded; 52% considered methadone maintenance to be effective. GPs were more confident managing smoking than alcohol and benzodiazepine dependence and least confident in illicit drug dependence. Fifty per cent reported having no patients on methadone and 40% between one and five patients. GPs in Fairfield and Liverpool reported having most patients; 25% were interested in prescribing methadone for patients in their own practice and 17% for patients referred to them. GPs who had more patients on methadone in their practice (especially those in Fairfield and Liverpool) considered methadone effective and were more likely to be interested in having patients referred to them. The most frequent reasons for not being interested were concerns about patients being demanding or aggressive or the impact on their practice. The most frequently requested support for shared care prescribing was for 24‐hour back‐up from specialist services, especially requested by those with less experience with patients on methadone. A shared‐care approach to facilitating greater GP involvement in prescribing appears feasible, especially among GPs with some previous experience with patients on methadone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713659318

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ABOUYANNI, G., STEVENS, L. J., HARRIS, M. F., WICKES, W. A., RAMAKRISHNA, S. S., TA, E., & KNOWLDEN, S. M.
Affiliations
Fairfield Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
HARRIS, MARK F.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
165-170
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W2099986808
Cited by
59
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
general practitioners, drug addiction, alcoholism, methadone maintenance treatment, GP attitudes, GP confidence, benzodiazepine dependence, smoking cessation, specialist referral, South West Sydney

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review