Cited by 412Disability Rights and RepresentationQualitative Research Methods and EthicsInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research

BARNES, COLIN·2003·Disability & Society

Abstract

This paper provides a broad-based overview of the development of emancipa tory disability research in the UK since its emergence in 1992. Drawing on personal experience in the field, the author responds to several important considerations that need to be addressed before considering adopting this controversial perspective. The paper is divided into two main sections. The first part provides a concise introduction to the thinking that underpins the concept of emancipatory disability research. The second section discusses key elements of this approach including the problem of accountability, the social model of disability, choice of methods and, empowerment, dissemination and outcomes. The paper concludes by suggesting that whilst there has been considerable progress over the last decade the future of emancipatory disability research remains precarious.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713662197

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The involvement of those living with chronic pain to shape the research design and interview focus is considered a strength of the study, as the information gained is more likely to be relevant to service users.

    “The involvement of those living with chronic pain (CP) to shape the research design and interview focus is considered as a strength of the study, as the information gained from the research is more likely to be of relevance to those using services.24”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BARNES, C.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
BARNES, COLIN
Venue
Disability & Society
Published
2003-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
3-17
ISSN
  • 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
  • 0968-7599
  • 1360-0508
OpenAlex
W1978426085
Cited by
406
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
FWCI
24.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Disability & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
disability research, social model of disability, researcher accountability, empowerment, research dissemination, research outcomes, research methodology, disability studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review