The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing
Abstract
Very little is known about how faces or other objects are analysed by human brain. In this paper I try to show that valuable information about some of the physiological processes involved can be derived from scalp-recorded, visual evoked potentials. The response properties of a distinct scalp potential, the “vertex positive peak” (VPP), are described, which suggest that there is a low-level, stimulusrelated stage of processing, probably located in the inferotemporal cortex, which is designed to detect very rapidly the suddenly fixated images of single faces or objects. The underlying cortical mechanisms: (1) respond to any two-dimensional patterned image consistent with the basic structure of a face; (2) respond more strongly and more quickly to faces than to objects; and (3) respond fastest of all to the most commonly experienced views of complete faces. Preliminary evidence further suggests that different neuronal populations in the same cortical areas are involved in the generation of face- and object-evoked VPP responses. The functional implications of these evoked potential findings are discussed, also their relationship to the results of other electrophysiological and psychological studies in humans and of neurobiological studies in monkeys. Some ways of further enhancing the information derived from such experiments are also suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
Yarbus, A. L. (1967) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7 · Cited by 3,304
Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography
(1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1 · Cited by 2,717
Attentional Control of Visual Perception: Cortical and Subcortical Mechanisms
Desimone, R., Wessinger, M., Thomas, L., & Schneider, W. (1990) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.090 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity
Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J.-P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/17120 · Cited by 1,915
The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces
Kanwisher, N., & Yovel, G. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1934 · Cited by 1,718
Is vision continuous with cognition?: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002022 · Cited by 1,243
Allison, T. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.5.415 · Cited by 882
Rossion, B., Joyce, C. A., Cottrell, G. W., & Tarr, M. J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010 · Cited by 768
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeffreys, D. A.
- Venue
- Visual Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-38
- ISSN
- 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0716
- OpenAlex
- W2092380150
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/713756729
- The paper
- Jeffreys, D. A. (1996). Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/713756729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.