Cited by 3,304Visual perception and processing mechanismsGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Eye Movements and Vision

Yarbus, Alfred L.·1967·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recordings of saccadic eye movements show that they are attracted to parts of the visual scene that have salient or precise information, such as the eyes and lips.

    “Recordings of saccadic eye movements show that they are attracted to parts of the visual scene that have salient or precise information; e.g., the eyes and lips (Yarbus, 1967).”

    From Virtual reality and consciousness inference in dreaming (2014) · cites this paper as Yarbus, 1967

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yarbus, A. L.
Corresponding author
Yarbus, Alfred L.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1967
OpenAlex
W4211165038
Cited by
3,304
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 104 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 144 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 123 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 151
FWCI
2.89
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
eye movements, vision, oculomotor control, visual perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review