The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization
Abstract
This paper deals with the key role of ecological modernization in bringing about sustainable development. So far, two strategies of sustainable development have been discussed: sufficiency and efficiency. Sufficiency is preferred by the organized ecology movement (non-governmental organizations (NGOs)), meaning self-limitation of material needs, withdrawal from the free world-market economy and an egalitarian distribution of the remaining scarce resources. Contrary to that, industry and business have adopted the ‘efficiency revolution’ as a strategy to allow further economic growth and ecological adaptation of industrial production by improving the environmental performance, i.e. improving the efficient use of material and energy, thus increasing resource productivity in addition to labour and capital productivity. There are good reasons for both sufficiency and efficiency. Nevertheless, they do have important shortcomings. An additional, third kind of transformational strategy needs to be pursued. In the present name-giving context, one could call it the strategy of ‘consistency’. A term with a similar meaning in the current discussion is ‘industrial ecology’. Industrial ecology aims at an industrial metabolism that is consistent with nature's metabolism. The transformation of traditional industrial structures, which are often environmentally unadapted to an ecologically modernized consistent industrial metabolism, implies major or basic technological innovations, as being different from incremental efficiency increasing change. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259
Cited by
Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817 · Cited by 773
Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability
Schader, C., Muller, A., Scialabba, N. E.-H., Hecht, J., Isensee, A., Erb, K.-H., Smith, P., Makkar, H. P. S., Klocke, P., Leiber, F., et al. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0891 · Cited by 361
The Neoliberalisation of Sustainability
Tulloch, L., & Neilson, D. (2014) · Citizenship, Social and Economics Education · doi:10.2304/csee.2014.13.1.26 · Cited by 74
Winder, G. M., & Bobar, A. (2018) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.003 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 269-285
- ISSN
- 1522-7200 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-908X
- OpenAlex
- W4253981452
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/1522-7200(200010/12)2:4%3C269::aid-jepp58%3E3.0.co;2-u
- The paper
- Huber, J. (2000). Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-7200(200010/12)2%3A4%3C269%3A%3Aaid-jepp58%3E3.0.co%3B2-u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.