Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activism and Conservation Behavior in an Environmental Movement: The Contradictory Effects of Gender

TINDALL, D. B., DAVIES, SCOTT, MAUBOULÈS, CÉLINE·2003·Society & Natural Resources

Abstract

Various authors suggest that environmentalism differs by gender, but systematic empirical evidence for this assertion is limited. We compare women's and men's environmental activism and environmentally friendly behavior (EFB) using survey data from probability samples of three British Columbia forest conservation organizations (n=381). The data were primarily analyzed using OLS multiple regression analysis. Findings show no substantial gender differences in level of activism, but reveal that women engage in significantly higher rates of EFB. Further, while level of activism is not a significant predictor of EFB among men, it is the strongest predictor among women. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed. Specifically, we argue that women may be more concerned about environmental issues and committed to environmentalism, but their limited biographical availability (e.g., personal constraints that present barriers to participation--as entailed in the demands of the "double day" of paid and domestic work) constrains their activism (McAdam 1986). However, because many environmentally friendly behaviors can be undertaken in the context of domestic labor and everyday routines, biographical availability does not constrain their EFB.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/716100620

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
TINDALL, D. B., DAVIES, S., & MAUBOULÈS, C.
Venue
Society & Natural Resources
Published
2003-11
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
909-932
ISSN
  • 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0723
OpenAlex
W2143835522
Cited by
323
References
33
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activism and Conservation Behavior in an Environmental Movement: The Contradictory Effects of Gender. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/716100620
The paper
TINDALL, D. B., DAVIES, S., & MAUBOULÈS, C. (2003). Activism and Conservation Behavior in an Environmental Movement: The Contradictory Effects of Gender. Society & Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.1080/716100620

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.