The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: Types, Processes, Benefits, and Characteristics
Abstract
For many years, cow’s milk has been considered as an essential food because of its nutritional value. However, the demand for plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) increased over recent years due to lactose intolerance and allergies, as well as different lifestyles. This review aims to provide updated information on the main raw materials used in PBMAs, as well as the production processes, technological functionality, nutritional composition, current consumption, benefits, sensory characteristics, and challenges in the development of PBMAs. Alternatives to formulate PBMAs are growing since traditional seeds or nuts are being rescued from endemic uses. Environmental benefits of PBMA over cow’s milk is still unclear since carbon footprint, eutrophication, and water consumption depend on geographic location. PBMAs are inadequate to cover the nutrimental profile of cow’s milk; however, the enrichment using additives and PBMAs blends are investigated to enhance their composition. Most PBMA physicochemical properties have close values to cow’s milk. However, PBMAs technological uses need improvements since gel formation, water holding capacity, texture, and viscoelastic properties of derived products are poor. Main challenges in PBMA are related to enhance their stabilization, reduced their antinutrients, off-flavors, and allergens. The treatment of PBMAs using emerging technologies seems to help overcome these challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216 · Cited by 6,085
Antinutrients in Plant-based Foods: A Review
Popova, A., & Mihaylova, D. (2019) · The Open Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874070701913010068 · Cited by 351
Li, C., Li, W., Chen, X., Feng, M., Rui, X., Jiang, M., & Dong, M. (2014) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2014.02.025 · Cited by 219
Soy protein allergy: Incidence and relative severity
Cordle, C. T. (2004) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/134.5.1213s · Cited by 162
Cited by
Appiani, M., Cattaneo, C., & Laureati, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.1268068 · Cited by 162
Hemp: A Sustainable Plant with High Industrial Value in Food Processing
Yano, H., & Fu, W. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12030651 · Cited by 106
Qazi, H. J., Ye, A., Acevedo-Fani, A., & Singh, H. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2024.2353366 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Reyes-Jurado, F., Soto-Reyes, N., Dávila-Rodríguez, M., Lorenzo-Leal, A. C., Jiménez-Munguía, M. T., Mani-López, E., & López-Malo, A.
- Venue
- Food Reviews International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-07-16
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2320-2351
- ISSN
- 1525-6103 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-9129
- OpenAlex
- W3185371192
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.