The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutritional Value and Use of the Andean Crops Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule)
Abstract
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoaWilld.) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicauleAellen) are native food plants of high nutritional value grown in the Andean region and used as food by the Incas and previous cultures. Quinoa and kañiwa served as a substitute for scarce animal proteins and are still one of the principal protein sources of the region. The importance of these proteins is based on their quality, with a balanced composition of essential amino acids similar to the composition of casein, the protein of milk. According to studies at the Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM), quinoa and kañiwa have a very high chemical score, and one cultivar of quinoa, Amarilla de Marangani, does not have any limiting amino acid. It is also important to recognize and utilize the relatively high quantity of oil in quinoa and kañiwa. These grains can be a potential raw material for oil extraction. The highest percentage of fatty acids present in these oils is Omega 6 (linoleic acid), being 50.2% for quinoa and 42.6% for kañiwa. The fatty acid composition is similar to corn germ oil. The concentrations of γ- and α-tocoferol were for quinoa 797.2 and 721.4 ppm, and for kañiwa 788.4 and 726 ppm, respectively. Quinoa and kañiwa can been utilized in weaning food mixtures. Two dietary mixtures have been formulated: quinoa-kañiwa-beans and quinoa-kiwicha-beans, with high nutritional value. The mixtures had PER values close to that of casein: 2.36 and 2.59, respectively (casein 2.5). Also, elderly people and those with a need to lose weight can benefit from consumption of quinoa and kañiwa. The high content of dietary fiber has many positive health effects, for example, it can reduce the level of cholesterol in the blood and improve digestion. For this reason, consumers in developed countries may also have an interest in including quinoa into their diet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vega‐Gálvez, A., Miranda, M., Vergara, J., Uribe, E., Puente, L., & Martínez, E. A. (2010) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.4158 · Cited by 985
Plant Proteins: Assessing Their Nutritional Quality and Effects on Health and Physical Function
Hertzler, S. R., Lieblein-Boff, J. C., Weiler, M., & Allgeier, C. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12123704 · Cited by 594
Chenopodium quinoa—An Indian perspective
Bhargava, A., Shukla, S., & Ohri, D. (2006) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.04.002 · Cited by 463
The Global Expansion of Quinoa: Trends and Limits
Bazile, D., Jacobsen, S.-E., & Verniau, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00622 · Cited by 423
Self-citationNutritional and Health Benefits of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
Navruz-Varli, S., & Sanlier, N. (2016) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2016.05.004 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Repo-Carrasco, R., Espinoza, C., & Jacobsen, S. E.
- Venue
- Food Reviews International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 179-189
- ISSN
- 1525-6103 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2091419759
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional Value and Use of the Andean Crops Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/fri-120018884
- The paper
- Repo-Carrasco, R., Espinoza, C., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2003). Nutritional Value and Use of the Andean Crops Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Reviews International. https://doi.org/10.1081/fri-120018884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.