Cited by 985Seed and Plant BiochemistryFood and Agricultural SciencesInsect Utilization and Effects

Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review

Open access
Vega‐Gálvez, Antonio, Miranda, Margarita, Vergara, Judith, Uribe, Elsa, Puente, Luis, Martínez, Enrique A·2010·Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Abstract

Quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa Willd., is an Amaranthacean, stress-tolerant plant cultivated along the Andes for the last 7000 years, challenging highly different environmental conditions ranging from Bolivia, up to 4.500 m of altitude, to sea level, in Chile. Its grains have higher nutritive value than traditional cereals and it is a promising worldwide cultivar for human consumption and nutrition. The quinoa has been called a pseudo-cereal for botanical reasons but also because of its unusual composition and exceptional balance between oil, protein and fat. The quinoa is an excellent example of 'functional food' that aims at lowering the risk of various diseases. Functional properties are given also by minerals, vitamins, fatty acids and antioxidants that can make a strong contribution to human nutrition, particularly to protect cell membranes, with proven good results in brain neuronal functions. Its minerals work as cofactors in antioxidant enzymes, adding higher value to its rich proteins. Quinoa also contains phytohormones, which offer an advantage over other plant foods for human nutrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jsfa.4158

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vega‐Gálvez, A., Miranda, M., Vergara, J., Uribe, E., Puente, L., & Martínez, E. A.
Affiliations
University of La Serena (CL)
Corresponding author
Vega‐Gálvez, Antonio
Venue
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
90
Issue
15
Pages
2541-2547
ISSN
  • 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0010
OpenAlex
W2041376597
Cited by
985
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
Keywords
quinoa, pseudocereals, functional foods, nutritional composition, protein quality, fatty acids, antioxidants, minerals, vitamins, plant hormones, Andean crops, stress tolerance, cell membrane protection
MeSH terms
Edible Grain, Nutritive Value, Seeds, Chenopodium quinoa, Functional Food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review