Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF TRANSFORMATION[1]

Danziger, James N., Andersen, Kim Viborg·2002·International Journal of Public Administration

Abstract

The impacts of information technology (IT) on public administration and the public sector are assessed by analyzing the empirical research reported in more than 1,000 issues of recent research journals (published between 1987 and 2000). These impacts are categorized in terms of four broad taxonomic domains and 22 specific impact categories. Almost half of the 230 specific findings identify changes in the capabilities of public sector units to perform functions and more than one-fourth of the findings involve changes in patterns of interaction among political actors. Relatively few IT-related changes affect the distribution of values or the orientations of political actors. In general, the highest proportions of positive impacts from IT are associated with the efficiency and rationality of behavior by units of public administration. The higher incidences of negative impacts tend to involve the more subjective effects of IT on people, in their roles as private citizens (e.g., privacy) or as public employees (e.g., job satisfaction, discretion). It is striking that there are relatively few grounded, empirical studies of the impacts of IT on public administration in the journals analyzed. About half of the empirical studies focus primarily on local level units of public administration, and most studies employ case-study methodology, with nearly one-half of the studies reporting on non-U.S. sites. The summarized and detailed findings in the article are offered as building blocs for more grounded theory on the impacts of IT on public administration and the public sector.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/pad-120003292

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V.
Venue
International Journal of Public Administration
Published
2002-04-20
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
591-627
ISSN
  • 0190-0692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4265
OpenAlex
W2031686279
Cited by
245
References
4
FWCI
30.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF TRANSFORMATION[1]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/pad-120003292
The paper
Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V. (2002). THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF TRANSFORMATION[1]. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1081/pad-120003292

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.