Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comparative Study of Adsorbents Prepared from Industrial Wastes for Removal of Dyes

Jain, A. K., Gupta, V. K., Bhatnagar, A., Suhas·2003·Separation Science and Technology

Abstract

Waste materials such as blast furnace dust, sludge and slag from steel plants and carbon slurry from fertilizer plants were treated and activated to prepare low-cost adsorbents. The adsorbents were chemically characterized and the surface area determined. The carbonaceous adsorbent prepared from carbon slurry had appreciable surface area (380 m2/g); whereas, the other three adsorbents had poor surface area (4–28 m2/g). The adsorption of three basic dyes, that is, chrysoidine G, crystal violet, and meldola blue was studied on all the adsorbents and the results indicated that only carbonaceous adsorbent removed the dyes from solution to an appreciable extent compared to the others. The carbanaceous adsorbent can, therefore, be a useful material for dye removal. All further studies were, therefore, done on the carbonaceous adsorbent. The adsorption isotherms of the dyes were found to conform to the Langmuir equation. The thermodynamic parameters calculated indicated that the dye adsorption was exothermic and physical in nature. The kinetic studies of the adsorption process showed it to be first order and pore diffusion controlled. The adsorption with the carbonaceous adsorbent is about 70–80% of the amount taken up by standard activated charcoal. Thus, the prepared carbonaceous adsorbent is efficient and can be used for the removal of dyes from solution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/ss-120016585

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jain, A. K., Gupta, V. K., Bhatnagar, A., & Suhas
Venue
Separation Science and Technology
Published
2003-01-03
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
463-481
ISSN
  • 0149-6395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5754
OpenAlex
W2045785438
Cited by
398
References
0
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.