The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iterative fractionation of recycling receptors from lysosomally destined ligands in an early sorting endosome
Abstract
To study the fusion and separation of endocytic compartments, we have used digital image analysis to quantify the accumulation of fluorescent ligands in endosomes during continuous endocytosis for periods of 1-20 min. Fluorescently labeled transferrin (Tf) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) were used as markers of recycling receptors and lysosomally directed ligands respectively. By measuring the intensity of individual endosomes, we found that the amount of LDL per endosome increases 30-40-fold between 1 and 10 min and then plateaus. In contrast, the amount of Tf per endosome reaches a steady state within 2 min at a level that is only three to four times that at 1 min. We used pulse-chase double label methods to demonstrate that Tf cycles through the compartment in which the LDL accumulates. When both Tf and LDL are added to cells simultaneously for 2 min, nearly all endosomes contain both labels. With 2-4 min further incubation in the absence of external ligands, LDL-containing compartments become depleted of Tf as Tf is directed to para-Golgi recycling endosomes. However, if Tf is added to the medium 2-4 min after a pulse with LDL, most of the LDL-containing endosomes become labeled with Tf. The data indicate that at least 30-40 endocytic vesicles containing both Tf and LDL fuse with an endosomal compartment over a period of 5-10 min. LDL accumulates within this compartment and Tf is simultaneously removed. Simple mathematical models suggest that this type of iterative fractionation can lead to very high efficiency sorting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LDL and transferrin initially enter into common endosomes via clathrin-mediated endocytosis but then quickly segregate.
“LDL and transferrin initially enter into common endosomes via clathrin-mediated endocytosis but then quickly segregate[26–28].”
From Genome-scale CRISPR screening for modifiers of cellular LDL uptake (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internalization and degradation of macrophage Fc receptors bound to polyvalent immune complexes.
Mellman, I., & Plutner, H. (1984) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.98.4.1170 · Cited by 251
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
To degrade or not to degrade: Mechanisms and significance of endocytic recycling
Cullen, P. J., & Steinberg, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7 · Cited by 590
ORGANELLES AND TRAFFICKING MACHINERY FOR POSTSYNAPTIC PLASTICITY
Kennedy, M. J., & Ehlers, M. D. (2006) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112808 · Cited by 346
Claypool, S. M., Dickinson, B. L., Wagner, J. S., Johansen, F.-E., Venu, N., Borawski, J. A., Lencer, W. I., & Blumberg, R. S. (2004) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e03-11-0832 · Cited by 139
Keyel, P. A., Mishra, S. K., Roth, R., Heuser, J. E., Watkins, S. C., & Traub, L. M. (2006) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e06-05-0421 · Cited by 134
Conti, F., Sertic, S., Reversi, A., & Chini, B. (2009) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.90590.2008 · Cited by 113
Genome-scale CRISPR screening for modifiers of cellular LDL uptake
Emmer, B. T., Sherman, E. J., Lascuna, P. J., Graham, S. E., Willer, C. J., & Ginsburg, D. (2021) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009285 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, K. W., McGraw, T. E., & Maxfield, F. R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York 10032.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3303-3314
- ISSN
- 0021-9525
- 1540-8140
- PMC
- PMC2115921
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review