Cited by 63Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchCellular transport and secretion

A nonfunctional sequence converted to a signal for glycophosphatidylinositol membrane anchor attachment.

Open access
Moran, P, Caras, I W·1991·The Journal of cell biology

Abstract

The COOH terminus of decay-accelerating factor (DAF) contains a signal that directs glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor attachment in a process involving concerted proteolytic removal of 28 COOH-terminal residues. At least two elements are required for anchor addition: a COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain and a cleavage/attachment site located NH2-terminal to it, requiring a small amino acid as the acceptor for GPI addition. We previously showed that the last 29-37 residues of DAF, making up the COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain plus 20 residues of the adjacent serine/threonine-rich domain (including the anchor addition site), when fused to the COOH terminus of human growth hormone (hGH) will target the fusion protein to the plasma membrane via a GPI anchor. In contrast, a similar fusion protein (hGH-LDLR-DAF17, abbreviated HLD) containing a fragment of the serine/threonine-rich domain of the LDL receptor (LDLR) in place of the DAF-derived serine/threonine-rich sequences, does not become GPI anchored. We now show that this null sequence for GPI attachment can be converted to a strong GPI signal by mutating a pair of residues (valine-glutamate) in the LDLR sequence at a position corresponding to the normal cleavage/attachment site, to serine-glycine, as found in the DAF sequence. A single mutation (converting valine at the anchor addition site to serine, the normal acceptor for GPI addition in DAF) was insufficient to produce GPI anchoring, as was mutation of the valine-glutamate pair to serine-phenylalanine (a bulky residue). These results suggest that a pair of small residues (presumably flanking the cleavage point) is required for GPI attachment. By introducing the sequence serine-glycine (comprising a cleavage-attachment site for GPI addition) at different positions in the LDLR sequence of the fusion protein, HLD, we show that optimal GPI attachment requires a processing site positioned 10-12 residues NH2-terminal to the hydrophobic domain, the efficiency anchor attachment dropping off sharply as the cleavage site is moved beyond these limits. These data suggest that the GPI signal consists solely of a hydrophobic domain combined with a processing site composed of a pair of small residues, positioned 10-12 residues NH2-terminal to the hydrophobic domain. No other structural motifs appear necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.115.2.329

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GPI-T catalyzes attachment of GPI anchors to the C-terminus of specific substrate proteins based on recognition of a C-terminal signal peptide.

    “which catalyzes the attachment of GPI anchors to the C-terminus of specific substrate proteins, based on recognition of a C-terminal signal peptide (91).”

    From Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes (2021) · cites this paper as [91]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moran, P., & Caras, I. W.
Affiliations
Genentech (US)
Venue
The Journal of cell biology
Published
1991-10-15
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
329-336
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2132762198
Cited by
63
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
CD55, LDL receptor, GPI anchoring, fusion protein, human growth hormone, membrane targeting, site-directed mutagenesis, plasma membrane
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Cell Line, Cell Membrane, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glycolipids, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Peptide Fragments, Phosphatidylinositols, Precipitin Tests, Receptors, LDL, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Growth Hormone, Transfection, Glycosylphosphatidylinositols, CD55 Antigens, Protein Sorting Signals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review