Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endocytic Sorting of Lipid Analogues Differing Solely in the Chemistry of Their Hydrophobic Tails

Open access
Mukherjee, Sushmita, Soe, Thwe Thwe, Maxfield, Frederick R.·1999·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

To understand the mechanisms for endocytic sorting of lipids, we investigated the trafficking of three lipid-mimetic dialkylindocarbocyanine (DiI) derivatives, DiIC16(3) (1,1′-dihexadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate), DiIC12(3) (1,1′- didodecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate), and FAST DiI (1,1′-dilinoleyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate), in CHO cells by quantitative fluorescence microscopy. All three DiIs have the same head group, but differ in their alkyl tail length or unsaturation; these differences are expected to affect their distribution in membrane domains of varying fluidity or curvature. All three DiIs initially enter sorting endosomes containing endocytosed transferrin. DiIC16(3), with two long 16-carbon saturated tails is then delivered to late endosomes, whereas FAST DiI, with two cis double bonds in each tail, and DiIC12(3), with saturated but shorter (12-carbon) tails, are mainly found in the endocytic recycling compartment. We also find that DiOC16(3) (3,3′- dihexadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate) and FAST DiO (3,3′-dilinoleyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate) behave similarly to their DiI counterparts. Furthermore, whereas a phosphatidylcholine analogue with a BODIPY (4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene) fluorophore attached at the end of a 5-carbon acyl chain is delivered efficiently to the endocytic recycling compartment, a significant fraction of another derivative with BODIPY attached to a 12-carbon acyl chain entered late endosomes. Our results thus suggest that endocytic organelles can sort membrane components efficiently based on their preference for association with domains of varying characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1271

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Mukherjee, S., Soe, T. T., & Maxfield, F. R.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1999-03-22
Volume
144
Issue
6
Pages
1271-1284
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2003337014
Cited by
383
References
1
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endocytic Sorting of Lipid Analogues Differing Solely in the Chemistry of Their Hydrophobic Tails. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.144.6.1271
The paper
Mukherjee, S., Soe, T. T., & Maxfield, F. R. (1999). Endocytic Sorting of Lipid Analogues Differing Solely in the Chemistry of Their Hydrophobic Tails. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.144.6.1271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.