The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rad51 Accumulation at Sites of DNA Damage and in Postreplicative Chromatin
Open accessAbstract
Rad51, a eukaryotic RecA homologue, plays a central role in homologous recombinational repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in yeast and is conserved from yeast to human. Rad51 shows punctuate nuclear localization in human cells, called Rad51 foci, typically during the S phase (Tashiro, S., N. Kotomura, A. Shinohara, K. Tanaka, K. Ueda, and N. Kamada. 1996. Oncogene. 12:2165–2170). However, the topological relationships that exist in human S phase nuclei between Rad51 foci and damaged chromatin have not been studied thus far. Here, we report on ultraviolet microirradiation experiments of small nuclear areas and on whole cell ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation experiments performed with a human fibroblast cell line. Before UV irradiation, nuclear DNA was sensitized by the incorporation of halogenated thymidine analogues. These experiments demonstrate the redistribution of Rad51 to the selectively damaged, labeled chromatin. Rad51 recruitment takes place from Rad51 foci scattered throughout the nucleus of nonirradiated cells in S phase. We also demonstrate the preferential association of Rad51 foci with postreplicative chromatin in contrast to replicating chromatin using a double labeling procedure with halogenated thymidine analogues. This finding supports a role of Rad51 in recombinational repair processes of DNA damage present in postreplicative chromatin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts
Nelms, B. E., Maser, R. S., MacKay, J. F., Lagally, M. G., & Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.590 · Cited by 500
Mills, K. D., Sinclair, D. A., & Guarente, L. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80772-2 · Cited by 334
Cited by
DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection
Khanna, K. K., & Jackson, S. P. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/85798 · Cited by 2,455
Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection
van Gent, D. C., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., & Kanaar, R. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35056049 · Cited by 1,219
Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links
Dronkert, M. L. G., & Kanaar, R. (2001) · Mutation Research/DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/s0921-8777(01)00092-1 · Cited by 555
Mammalian cell cycle checkpoints: signalling pathways and their organization in space and time
Lukas, J., Lukas, C., & Bartek, J. (2004) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.006 · Cited by 381
Recruitment of DNA methyltransferase I to DNA repair sites
Mortusewicz, O., Schermelleh, L., Walter, J., Cardoso, M. C., & Leonhardt, H. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0501034102 · Cited by 380
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tashiro, S., Walter, J., Shinohara, A., Kamada, N., & Cremer, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2000-07-24
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283-292
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2092265336
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rad51 Accumulation at Sites of DNA Damage and in Postreplicative Chromatin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.150.2.283
- The paper
- Tashiro, S., Walter, J., Shinohara, A., Kamada, N., & Cremer, T. (2000). Rad51 Accumulation at Sites of DNA Damage and in Postreplicative Chromatin. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.150.2.283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.