Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The GTP binding proteins Gem and Rad are negative regulators of the Rho–Rho kinase pathway

Open access
Ward, Yvona, Yap, Seow-Fong, Ravichandran, V., Matsumura, Fumio, Ito, Masaaki, Spinelli, Beth, Kelly, Kathleen·2002·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

The cytoskeletal changes that alter cellular morphogenesis and motility depend upon a complex interplay among molecules that regulate actin, myosin, and other cytoskeletal components. The Rho family of GTP binding proteins are important upstream mediators of cytoskeletal organization. Gem and Rad are members of another family of small GTP binding proteins (the Rad, Gem, and Kir family) for which biochemical functions have been mostly unknown. Here we show that Gem and Rad interface with the Rho pathway through association with the Rho effectors, Rho kinase (ROK) α and β. Gem binds ROKβ independently of RhoA in the ROKβ coiled-coil region adjacent to the Rho binding domain. Expression of Gem inhibited ROKβ-mediated phosphorylation of myosin light chain and myosin phosphatase, but not LIM kinase, suggesting that Gem acts by modifying the substrate specificity of ROKβ. Gem or Rad expression led to cell flattening and neurite extension in N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells. In interference assays, Gem opposed ROKβ- and Rad opposed ROKα-mediated cell rounding and neurite retraction. Gem did not oppose cell rounding initiated by ROKβ containing a deletion of the Gem binding region, demonstrating that Gem binding to ROKβ is required for the effects observed. In epithelial or fibroblastic cells, Gem or Rad expression resulted in stress fiber and focal adhesion disassembly. In addition, Gem reverted the anchorage-independent growth and invasiveness of Dbl-transformed fibroblasts. These results identify physiological roles for Gem and Rad in cytoskeletal regulation mediated by ROK.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200111026

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Ward, Y., Yap, S.-F., Ravichandran, V., Matsumura, F., Ito, M., Spinelli, B., & Kelly, K.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2002-04-15
Volume
157
Issue
2
Pages
291-302
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W1974941580
Cited by
188
References
2
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The GTP binding proteins Gem and Rad are negative regulators of the Rho–Rho kinase pathway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.200111026
The paper
Ward, Y., Yap, S.-F., Ravichandran, V., Matsumura, F., Ito, M., Spinelli, B., & Kelly, K. (2002). The GTP binding proteins Gem and Rad are negative regulators of the Rho–Rho kinase pathway. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200111026

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.