The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel role for p120 catenin in E-cadherin function
Open accessAbstract
Îndirect evidence suggests that p120-catenin (p120) can both positively and negatively affect cadherin adhesiveness. Here we show that the p120 gene is mutated in SW48 cells, and that the cadherin adhesion system is impaired as a direct consequence of p120 insufficiency. Restoring normal levels of p120 caused a striking reversion from poorly differentiated to cobblestone-like epithelial morphology, indicating a crucial role for p120 in reactivation of E-cadherin function. The rescue efficiency was enhanced by increased levels of p120, and reduced by the presence of the phosphorylation domain, a region previously postulated to confer negative regulation. Surprisingly, the rescue was associated with substantially increased levels of E-cadherin. E-cadherin mRNA levels were unaffected by p120 expression, but E-cadherin half-life was more than doubled. Direct p120–E-cadherin interaction was crucial, as p120 deletion analysis revealed a perfect correlation between E-cadherin binding and rescue of epithelial morphology. Interestingly, the epithelial morphology could also be rescued by forced expression of either WT E-cadherin or a p120-uncoupled mutant. Thus, the effects of uncoupling p120 from E-cadherin can be at least partially overcome by artificially maintaining high levels of cadherin expression. These data reveal a cooperative interaction between p120 and E-cadherin and a novel role for p120 that is likely indispensable in normal cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vleminckx, K., Vakaet, L., Mareel, M., Fiers, W., & Van Roy, F. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90143-m · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
Adherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis
Harris, T. J. C., & Tepass, U. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2927 · Cited by 990
Perez-Moreno, M., Jamora, C., & Fuchs, E. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00108-9 · Cited by 721
Niessen, C. M., Leckband, D., & Yap, A. S. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00004.2010 · Cited by 427
Qian, X., Karpova, T., Sheppard, A. M., McNally, J., & Lowy, D. R. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600136 · Cited by 396
Ishiyama, N., Lee, S.-H., Liu, S., Li, G.-Y., Smith, M. J., Reichardt, L. F., & Ikura, M. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.017 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Ireton, R. C., Davis, M. A., van Hengel, J., Mariner, D. J., Barnes, K., Thoreson, M. A., Anastasiadis, P. Z., Matrisian, L., Bundy, L. M., Sealy, L., Gilbert, B., van Roy, F., & Reynolds, A. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2002-11-11
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 465-476
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2114718608
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel role for p120 catenin in E-cadherin function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.200205115
- The paper
- Ireton, R. C., Davis, M. A., van Hengel, J., Mariner, D. J., Barnes, K., Thoreson, M. A., Anastasiadis, P. Z., Matrisian, L., Bundy, L. M., Sealy, L., Gilbert, B., van Roy, F., & Reynolds, A. B. (2002). A novel role for p120 catenin in E-cadherin function. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200205115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.