The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control
Open accessAbstract
Misfolded proteins retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are degraded by the ER-associated degradation pathway. The mechanisms used to sort them from correctly folded proteins remain unclear. Analysis of substrates with defined folded and misfolded domains has revealed a system of sequential checkpoints that recognize topologically distinct domains of polypeptides. The first checkpoint examines the cytoplasmic domains of membrane proteins. If a lesion is detected, it is retained statically in the ER and rapidly degraded without regard to the state of its other domains. Proteins passing this test face a second checkpoint that monitors domains localized in the ER lumen. Proteins detected by this pathway are sorted from folded proteins and degraded by a quality control mechanism that requires ER-to-Golgi transport. Although the first checkpoint is obligatorily directed at membrane proteins, the second monitors both soluble and membrane proteins. Our data support a model whereby “properly folded” proteins are defined biologically as survivors that endure a series of distinct checkpoints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol
Ye, Y., Meyer, H. H., & Rapoport, T. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414652a · Cited by 1,099
Hammond, C., & Helenius, A. (1994) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.126.1.41 · Cited by 443
Cited by
One step at a time: endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation
Vembar, S. S., & Brodsky, J. L. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2546 · Cited by 1,299
Protein quality control in the early secretory pathway
Anelli, T., & Sitia, R. (2008) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601974 · Cited by 623
Protein Quality Control in the Cytosol and the Endoplasmic Reticulum: Brothers in Arms
Buchberger, A., Bukau, B., & Sommer, T. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.001 · Cited by 483
Molecular chaperones and proteostasis regulation during redox imbalance
Niforou, K., Cheimonidou, C., & Trougakos, I. P. (2014) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.017 · Cited by 250
Defining the Glycan Destruction Signal for Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation
Quan, E. M., Kamiya, Y., Kamiya, D., Denic, V., Weibezahn, J., Kato, K., & Weissman, J. S. (2008) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.017 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Vashist, S., & Ng, D. T. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2004-04-12
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-52
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W1984347348
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.200309132
- The paper
- Vashist, S., & Ng, D. T. W. (2004). Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200309132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.