Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate

Open access
Knights, Chad D., Catania, Jason, Giovanni, Simone Di, Muratoglu, Selen, Perez, Ricardo, Swartzbeck, Amber, Quong, Andrew A., Zhang, Xiaojing, Beerman, Terry, Pestell, Richard G., Avantaggiati, Maria Laura·2006·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

The activity of the p53 gene product is regulated by a plethora of posttranslational modifications. An open question is whether such posttranslational changes act redundantly or dependently upon one another. We show that a functional interference between specific acetylated and phosphorylated residues of p53 influences cell fate. Acetylation of lysine 320 (K320) prevents phosphorylation of crucial serines in the NH2-terminal region of p53; only allows activation of genes containing high-affinity p53 binding sites, such as p21/WAF; and promotes cell survival after DNA damage. In contrast, acetylation of K373 leads to hyperphosphorylation of p53 NH2-terminal residues and enhances the interaction with promoters for which p53 possesses low DNA binding affinity, such as those contained in proapoptotic genes, leading to cell death. Further, acetylation of each of these two lysine clusters differentially regulates the interaction of p53 with coactivators and corepressors and produces distinct gene-expression profiles. By analogy with the “histone code” hypothesis, we propose that the multiple biological activities of p53 are orchestrated and deciphered by different “p53 cassettes,” each containing combination patterns of posttranslational modifications and protein–protein interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200512059

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Knights, C. D., Catania, J., Giovanni, S. D., Muratoglu, S., Perez, R., Swartzbeck, A., Quong, A. A., Zhang, X., Beerman, T., Pestell, R. G., & Avantaggiati, M. L.
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2006-05-22
Volume
173
Issue
4
Pages
533-544
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2147723796
Cited by
287
References
4
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.200512059
The paper
Knights, C. D., Catania, J., Giovanni, S. D., Muratoglu, S., Perez, R., Swartzbeck, A., Quong, A. A., Zhang, X., Beerman, T., Pestell, R. G., & Avantaggiati, M. L. (2006). Distinct p53 acetylation cassettes differentially influence gene-expression patterns and cell fate. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.