The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ORGANIC MATRIX AND THE INORGANIC CRYSTALS OF EMBRYONIC BOVINE ENAMEL
Open accessAbstract
Electron microscope and electron diffraction studies of developing embryonic bovine enamel have revealed the organization of the organic matrix and the inorganic crystals. The most recently deposited inorganic crystals located at the ameloblast-enamel junction are thin plates, approximately 1300 A long, 400 A wide, and 19 A thick. During maturation of the enamel, crystal growth occurs primarily by an increase in crystal thickness. Statistical analyses failed to show a significant change in either the width or the length of the crystals during the period of maturation studied. Even in the earliest stages of calcification, the crystals are organized within the prisms so that their long axes (c-axes) are oriented parallel to the long axes of the prisms but randomly distributed about their long axes. With maturation of the enamel, the crystals become more densely packed and more highly oriented within the prisms. The organic matrix in decalcified sections of enamel is strikingly similar in its over-all organization to that of the fully mineralized tissue. When viewed in longitudinal prism profiles, the intraprismatic organic matrix is composed of relatively thin dense lines, approximately 48 A wide, which are relatively parallel to each other and have their fiber axes parallel to the long axes of the prisms within which they are located. Many of these dense lines, which have the appearance of thin filaments, are organized into doublets, the individual 48 A wide filaments of the doublets being separated by approximately 120 A. When observed in oblique prism profiles, the intraprismatic organic matrix is likewise remarkably similar in general orientation and organization to that of the fully mineralized tissue. Moreover, the spaces between adjacent doublets or between single filaments have the appearance of compartments. These compartments, more clearly visualized in cross- or near cross-sectional prism profiles, are oval or near oval in shape. Therefore, the appearance of the intraprismatic organic matrix (in longitudinal, oblique, and cross-sectional prism profiles) indicates that it is organized into tubular sheaths which are oriented with their long axes parallel to the long axes of the prisms in which they are located, but randomly oriented about their own long axes, an orientation again remarkably "blue printing" that of the inorganic crystals. The predominant feature of the walls of the tubular sheaths, when viewed in cross- or near cross-section, is that of continuous sheets, although in many cases closely packed dot-like structures of approximately 48 A were also observed, suggesting that the wall of the sheaths consists of a series of closely packed filaments. The 48 A wide dense lines (filaments) representing the width of the sheath wall were resolved into two dense strands when viewed in longitudinal prism profiles. Each strand was 12 A wide and was separated by a less electron-dense space 17 A wide. The intraprismatic organic matrix is surrounded by a prism sheath which corresponds in mineralized sections to the electron-lucent uncalcified regions separating adjacent prisms. Structurally, the prism sheaths appear to consist of filaments arranged in basket-weave fashion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dental Enamel Formation and Implications for Oral Health and Disease
Lacruz, R. S., Habelitz, S., Wright, J. T., & Paine, M. L. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00030.2016 · Cited by 599
Protein-mediated Enamel Mineralization
Moradian-Oldak, J. (2012) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/4034 · Cited by 321
Role of Macromolecular Assembly of Enamel Matrix Proteins in Enamel Formation
Margolis, H. C., Beniash, E., & Fowler, C. E. (2006) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910608500902 · Cited by 294
The hidden structure of human enamel
Beniash, E., Stifler, C. A., Sun, C.-Y., Jung, G. S., Qin, Z., Buehler, M. J., & Gilbert, P. U. P. A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12185-7 · Cited by 265
Mineralization in Organic Matrix Frameworks
Veis, A. (2003) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2113/0540249 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Travis, D. F., & Glimcher, M. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1964-12-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 447-497
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2090533989
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ORGANIC MATRIX AND THE INORGANIC CRYSTALS OF EMBRYONIC BOVINE ENAMEL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.23.3.447
- The paper
- Travis, D. F., & Glimcher, M. J. (1964). THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF, AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ORGANIC MATRIX AND THE INORGANIC CRYSTALS OF EMBRYONIC BOVINE ENAMEL. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.23.3.447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.