The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HUMAN WOUND REPAIR
Open accessAbstract
A series of linearly incised superficial skin wounds was made on the forearms of young adult male volunteers. Wounds were sampled at several intervals between 3 hr and 21 days after wounding, for study by light and electron microscopy. The light microscopic observations show that regeneration of epidermis in human wounds conforms chronologically to that reported for the epidermis in superficial wound repair in laboratory animals. It is further shown that "ruffling" of cell membranes characterizes the cells of the migrating epidermis in early wound healing. This study reveals that the basement lamina and hemidesmosomes are established by epidermis in contact with the fibrin net at the base of early wounds. Epidermal cells in the wound environment are shown to be phagocytic. Analysis of the submicroscopic cytology of differentiating and maturing regenerated epidermis reveals that, in the sequence of events, the formation of filaments, basal lamina, and desmosomes is followed chronologically by evolution of keratohyalin granules and, subsequently, by keratinization of the surface epidermal elements. The entire sequence of migration, differentiation, and ultimate keratinization in the superficial wounds studied requires 3–5 days for completion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haensel, D., & Dai, X. (2018) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.24561 · Cited by 232
Phagocytosis of latex beads by epidermal keratinocytes in vivo
Wolff, K., & Konrad, K. (1972) · Journal of Ultrastructure Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-5320(72)90022-6 · Cited by 96
Fukano, Y., Usui, M. L., Underwood, R. A., Isenhath, S., Marshall, A. J., Hauch, K. D., Ratner, B. D., Olerud, J. E., & Fleckman, P. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32798 · Cited by 83
Underwood, R. A., Usui, M. L., Zhao, G., Hauch, K. D., Takeno, M. M., Ratner, B. D., Marshall, A. J., Shi, X., Olerud, J. E., & Fleckman, P. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.33125 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Odland, G., & Ross, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1968-10-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-151
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2027325645
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HUMAN WOUND REPAIR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.39.1.135
- The paper
- Odland, G., & Ross, R. (1968). HUMAN WOUND REPAIR. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.39.1.135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.