Cited by 52Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineWound Healing and Treatments

Quantifying the effect of pore size and surface treatment on epidermal incorporation into percutaneously implanted sphere‐templated porous biomaterials in mice

Open access
Underwood, Robert A., Usui, Marcia L., Zhao, Ge, Hauch, Kip D., Takeno, Marc M., Ratner, Buddy D., Marshall, Andrew J., Shi, Xuefeng +2 more·2011·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

The sinus between skin and a percutaneous medical device is often a portal for infection. Epidermal integration into an optimized porous biomaterial could seal this sinus. In this study, we measured epithelial ingrowth into rods of sphere‐templated porous poly(2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate) implanted percutaneously in mice. The rods contained spherical 20‐, 40‐, or 60‐μm pores with and without surface modification. Epithelial migration was measured 3, 7, and 14 days post‐implantation utilizing immunohistochemistry for pankeratins and image analysis. Our global results showed average keratinocyte migration distances of 81 ± 16.85 μm (SD). Migration was shorter through 20‐μm pores (69.32 ± 21.73) compared with 40 and 60 μm (87.04 ± 13.38 μm and 86.63 ± 8.31 μm, respectively). Migration was unaffected by 1,1′ carbonyldiimidazole surface modification without considering factors of pore size and healing duration. Epithelial integration occurred quickly showing an average migration distance of 74.13 ± 12.54 μm after 3 days without significant progression over time. These data show that the epidermis closes the sinus within 3 days, migrates into the biomaterial (an average of 11% of total rod diameter), and stops. This process forms an integrated epithelial collar without evidence of marsupialization or permigration. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A:, 2011.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.33125

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Porous biomaterials of the same composition as non-porous forms that elicit foreign body reaction and encapsulation heal with less encapsulation and more vascularity when implanted into dermis or cardiac tissues.

    “Recent studies have demonstrated that porous biomaterials of the same composition as those which, in their non-porous form, elicit an FBR and encapsulation heal with less encapsulation and more vascularity when implanted into either the dermis or into cardiac tissues [147–149].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Odland G Ross R Human wound repair. I. Epidermal regeneration J Cell Biol 1968 39 1 135 151 5678445 PMC2107509
  2. [9]Marshall AJ Porous hydrogels with well-defined pore structure for biomaterials applications PhD dissertation University of Washington 2004
  3. [10]Marshall AJ Ratner BD A new technique for fabrication of macroporous hydogels Transactions of the Society for Biomaterials 2001
  4. [12]Marshall AJ Ratner BD Quantitative characterization of sphere-templated porous biomaterials AIChE Journal 2005 51 4 1221 1232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Underwood, R. A., Usui, M. L., Zhao, G., Hauch, K. D., Takeno, M. M., Ratner, B. D., Marshall, A. J., Shi, X., Olerud, J. E., & Fleckman, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Healionics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Underwood, Robert A.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-16
Volume
98A
Issue
4
Pages
499-508
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2093468353
Cited by
52
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (T32AR007019)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (EB-004422, R01EB004422)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
epithelial cell migration, keratinocyte migration, pore size, surface modification, carbonyldiimidazole, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), percutaneous implantation, infection control, marsupialization
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Movement, Epidermis, Male, Materials Testing, Methacrylates, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Surface Properties, Keratinocytes, Porosity, Implants, Experimental, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review