Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro.

Open access
Bard, J B, Hay, E D·1975·The Journal of cell biology

Abstract

The early chick cornea is composed of an acellular collagenous stroma lined with an anterior epithelium and a posterior endothelium. At stage 27-28 of development (5 1/2 days), this stroma swells so that the cornea is 75-120 mum thick. At the same time, fibroblasts that originate from the neural crest begin to invade this stroma. Using Nomarski light microscopy, we have compared the behavior of moving cells in isolated corneas with the migratory activities of the same cells in artificial collagen lattices and on glass. In situ, fibroblasts have cyclindrical bodies from which extend several thick pseudopodia and/or finer filopodia. Movement is accompanied by activity in these cytoplasmic processes. The flat ruffling lamelli-podia that characterize these cells on glass are not seen in situ, but the general mechanism of cell movement seems to be the same as that observed in vitro: either gross contraction or recoil of the cell body (now pear shaped) into the forward cell process, or more subtle "flowing" of cytoplasm into the forward cell process without immediate loss of the trailing cell process. We filmed collisions between cells in situ and in three-dimensional collagen lattices. These fibroblasts show, in their pair-wise collisions, the classical contact inhibition of movement (CIM) exhibited in vitro even though they lack ruffled borders. On glass these cells multi-layer, showing that, while CIM affects cell movement, fibroblasts can use one another as a substratum. Postmitotic cells show CIM in moving away from each other. Interestingly, dividing cells in situ do not exhibit surface blebbing, but do extend filopodia at telophase. The role of CIM in controlling cell movement in vivo and in vitro is stressed in the discussion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.67.2.400

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Bard, J. B., & Hay, E. D.
Venue
The Journal of cell biology
Published
1975-11-01
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
400-418
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2105245659
Cited by
262
References
24
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.67.2.400
The paper
Bard, J. B., & Hay, E. D. (1975). The behavior of fibroblasts from the developing avian cornea. Morphology and movement in situ and in vitro. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.67.2.400

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.