The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after (125)I-α-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions
Open accessAbstract
The distribution and quantitation of (125)I-α-bungarotoxin (α- BTX) binding sites and thus acetylcholine receptor (AChR) were determined in mouse sternomastoid muscle by electron microscope autoradiography. We found that a valid criterion for receptor saturation at the neuromuscular junction was the complete elimination of neurally evoked tetantic muscle contractions, since, when such a criterion was used for the endpoint of toxin incubation, α-BTX was bound to approximately 90 percent of total available endplate sites. When, without implying localization, the presynaptic axonal membrane was used as a convenient reference structure, the concentration of α-BTX relative to this membrane was determined to be 46,000 +/- 27 percent sites/μm(2). By testing various hypothetical models the distribution of developed grains was found to be consistent with the hypothesis that the main acetylcholine-receptive surface coincides with the electron-dense, thickened portion of the junctional fold membrane situated at the juxtaneuronal region of the folds and dipping approximately 2,200 A be approximately 30,500 +/- 27 percent sites/μm(2) of this postsynaptic dense membrane. There was a sharp gradient in α-BTX binding extrajunctionally, with the concentration decreasing to approximately 4 percent of the subsynaptic value within 1μm from the edge of an axonal terminal (bouton) to <1 percent within 3μm and to <0.2 percent beyond 7 μm from that terminal. Below 4,000 A (i.e. half-way from the top of the junctional folds) the concentration of α-BTX was also about 3 percent of the peak subsynaptic value. The binding density at the bottom of the junctional folds is this comparable to extrajunctional sarcolemma at equal distance from a nerve terminal. The molecular organization at the neuromuscular junction relative to its function is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TURNOVER OF TRANSMITTER AND SYNAPTIC VESICLES AT THE FROG NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION
Ceccarelli, B., Hurlbut, W. P., & Mauro, A. (1973) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.57.2.499 · Cited by 837
Functional changes in frog neuromuscular junctions studied with freeze-fracture
Heuser, J. E., Reese, T. S., & Landis, D. M. D. (1974) · Journal of Neurocytology · doi:10.1007/bf01111936 · Cited by 516
Acetylcholine Receptors in Muscle Fibres
MILEDI, R., & POTTER, L. T. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/233599a0 · Cited by 440
AUTORADIOGRAPHY WITH THE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
Salpeter, M. M., & Bachmann, L. (1964) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.22.2.469 · Cited by 373
Self-citationSynthesis, storage and release of [14C]acetylcholine in isolated rat diaphragm muscles
Potter, L. T. (1970) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009003 · Cited by 359
Fertuck, H. C., & Salpeter, M. M. (1974) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.4.1376 · Cited by 313
Self-citationDEPLETION OF VESICLES FROM FROG NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTIONS BY PROLONGED TETANIC STIMULATION
Ceccarelli, B., Hurlbut, W. P., & Mauro, A. (1972) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.54.1.30 · Cited by 303
THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF A REPTILIAN MYONEURAL JUNCTION
Robertson, J. D. (1956) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.2.4.381 · Cited by 263
Ultrastructure of the ‘active zone’ in the frog neuromuscular junction
Dreyer, F., Peper, K., Akert, K., Sandri, C., & Moor, H. (1973) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(73)90699-9 · Cited by 222
Cholinergic Receptor Molecules and Cholinesterase Molecules at Mouse Skeletal Muscle Junctions
BARNARD, E. A., WIECKOWSKI, J., & CHIU, T. H. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/234207a0 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Acetylcholine Receptor: An Allosteric Protein
Changeux, J.-P., Devillers-Thiéry, A., & Chemouilli, P. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6382611 · Cited by 623
Herkenham, M. (1987) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(87)90268-5 · Cited by 520
Dystroglycan-α, a dystrophin-associated glycoprotein, is a functional agrin receptor
Gee, S. H., Montanaro, F., Lindenbaum, M. H., & Carbonetto, S. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90052-3 · Cited by 512
Glutamate receptor dynamics in dendritic microdomains.
Newpher, T. M., & Ehlers, M. D. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.030 · Cited by 356
Acceptors for botulinum neurotoxin reside on motor nerve terminals and mediate its internalization
Dolly, J. O., Black, J., Williams, R. S., & Melling, J. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307457a0 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Fertuck, H., & Salpeter, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1976-04-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-158
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2092086822
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after (125)I-α-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.69.1.144
- The paper
- Fertuck, H., & Salpeter, M. (1976). Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after (125)I-α-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.69.1.144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.