Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Synthesis, storage and release of [14C]acetylcholine in isolated rat diaphragm muscles

Open access
Potter, L. T.·1970·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Segments of rat diaphragms were kept in choline‐free media for 4 hr and were then exposed to a physiological concentration of [14 C]‐choline (30 μ M) at 37° C. The synthesis, storage and subsequent release of [14 C]acetylcholine by the muscles was assessed by isotopic‐ and bio‐assays after isolation of the transmitter by paper electrophoresis. 2. Replacement of endogenous acetylcholine (0·92 μ‐mole/kg) with labelled acetylcholine proceeded slowly at rest, but rapidly during nerve stimulation. [14 C]Acetylcholine accumulated most rapidly when hydrolysis of the released transmitter, and thus the re‐use of endogenous choline, was prevented by an esterase inhibitor. Fully replaced stores were maintained during nerve stimulation by synthesis rates sufficient to replenish at least 35% of the store size in 5 min. 3 In the presence of hemicholinium‐3, which inhibits choline uptake, acetylcholine stores declined rapidly during stimulation, and residual synthesis was slight, indicating little intraneural choline. Net choline uptake into nerve terminals was estimated from the highest observed synthesis rate and from previous measurements of the number and size of terminals, as 3‐6 p‐mole/cm 2 sec. 4. Transmitter synthesis was localized in the region of end‐plates, and was reduced to a few per cent of normal 6 weeks after phrenic nerve section. Release experiments suggested that at least half of the acetylcholine in phrenic nerves is in their terminals; from this content and the morphology of the terminals, the average concentration of transmitter in the whole endings would appear to be about 50 m‐mole/l. Homogenization of the muscles freed choline acetyltransferase into solution, but left some [14 C]acetylcholine associated with small particles, presumably synaptic vesicles. 5. Resting transmitter release was about 0·013% of stores/sec. With 360 nerve impulses at 1‐20/sec, release increased up to 0·43% of stores/sec, and amounted to 3·5–7 × 10−18 moles per end‐plate per impulse. The release rate was unaffected by the doubling of store size which occurred with eserine, but the extra transmitter did help to maintain releasable stores during prolonged stimulation. Experiments with fractional store labelling indicated that newly synthesized acetylcholine was preferentially released. 6. Preformed [3 H]acetylcholine was not taken up and retained by muscle or nerve cells in the absence of an esterase inhibitor. With eserine present, labelled acetylcholine was taken up uniformly by muscle segments; when eserine was then removed, radioactive acetylcholine remained only near neuromuscular junctions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Potter, L. T.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1970-01
Volume
206
Issue
1
Pages
145-166
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2012589533
Cited by
359
References
0
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis, storage and release of [14C]acetylcholine in isolated rat diaphragm muscles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009003
The paper
Potter, L. T. (1970). Synthesis, storage and release of [14C]acetylcholine in isolated rat diaphragm muscles. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.