The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative reflection contrast microscopy of living cells.
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian cells in culture (BHK-21, PtK2, Friend, human flia, and glioma cells) have been observed by reflection contrast microscopy. Images of cells photographed at two different wavelengths (546 and 436 nm) or at two different angles of incidence allowed discrimination between reflected light and light that was both reflected and modulated by interference. Interference is involved when a change in reflected intensity (relative to glass/medium background reflected intensity) occurs on changing either the illumination wavelength or the reflection incidence angle. In cases where interference occurs, refractive indices can be determined at points where the optical path difference is known, by solving the given interference equation. Where cells are at least 50 nm distant from the glass substrate, intensities are also influenced by that distance as well as by the light's angle of incidence and wavelength. The reflected intensity at the glass/medium interface is used as a standard in calculating the refractive index of the cortical cytoplasm. Refractive indices were found to be higher (1.38--1.40) at points of focal contact, where stress fibers terminate, than in areas of close contact (1.354--1.368). In areas of the cortical cytoplasm, between focal contacts, not adherent to the glass substrate, refractive indices between 1.353 and 1.368 were found. This was thought to result from a microfilamentous network within the cortical cytoplasm. Intimate attachment of cells to their substrate is assumed to be characterized by a lack of an intermediate layer of culture medium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Focal Adhesions: Transmembrane Junctions Between the Extracellular Matrix and the Cytoskeleton
Burridge, K., Fath, K., Kelly, T., Nuckolls, G., & Turner, C. (1988) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002415 · Cited by 2,120
Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence.
Axelrod, D. (1981) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.89.1.141 · Cited by 832
Enhancement of axial resolution in fluorescence microscopy by standing-wave excitation
Bailey, B., Farkas, D. L., Taylor, D. L., & Lanni, F. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366044a0 · Cited by 324
Extracellular Matrix Cell Adhesion Peptides: Functional Applications in Orthopedic Materials
LeBaron, R. G., & Athanasiou, K. A. (2000) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632700320720 · Cited by 306
Effects of bisphosphonates on isolated Rat osteoclasts as examined by reflected light microscopy
Sato, M., & Grasser, W. (1990) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650050107 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Bereiter-Hahn, J., Fox, C. H., & Thorell, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1979-09-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 767-779
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W1984842461
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative reflection contrast microscopy of living cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.82.3.767
- The paper
- Bereiter-Hahn, J., Fox, C. H., & Thorell, B. (1979). Quantitative reflection contrast microscopy of living cells. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.82.3.767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.