The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The entry of diphtheria toxin into the mammalian cell cytoplasm: evidence for lysosomal involvement.
Open accessAbstract
Lysosomotropic amines, such as ammonium chloride, are known to protect cells from the cytotoxic effects of diphtheria toxin. These drugs are believed to inhibit the transport of the toxin from a receptor at the cell exterior into the cytoplasm where a fragment of the toxin arrests protein synthesis. We studied the effects of lysosomotropic agents on the cytotoxic process to better understand how the toxin enters the cytoplasm. The cytotoxic effects of diphtheria toxin were not inhibited by antitoxin when cells were preincubated at 37 degrees C with toxin and ammonium chloride, exposed to antitoxin at 4 degrees C, washed to relieve the ammonium chloride inhibition, and finally warmed to 37 degrees C. The antigenic determinants of the toxin were, therefore, either altered or sheltered. It is likely that the combination of ammonium chloride and a low temperature trapped the toxin in an intracellular vesicle from which the toxin could proceed to the cytoplasm. Because lysosomotropic amines raise the pH within acidic intracellular vesicles, such as lysosomes, they could trap the toxin within such a vesicle if an acidic environment were necessary for the toxin to penetrate into the cytoplasm. We simulated acidic conditions which the toxin might encounter by exposing cells with toxin bound to their surface to acidic medium. We then measured the effects of lysosomotropic amines on the activity of the toxin to see if the acidic environment substituted for the function normally inhibited by the drugs. The drugs no longer protected the cells. This suggests that exposing the toxin to an acidic environment, such as that found within lysosomes, is an important step in the penetration of diphtheria toxin into the cytoplasm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endocytosis and the recycling of plasma membrane.
Steinman, R. M., Mellman, I. S., Muller, W. A., & Cohn, Z. A. (1983) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.96.1.1 · Cited by 1,450
Diphtheria toxin receptor–mediated conditional and targeted cell ablation in transgenic mice
Saito, M., Iwawaki, T., Taya, C., Yonekawa, H., Noda, M., Inui, Y., Mekada, E., Kimata, Y., Tsuru, A., & Kohno, K. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/90795 · Cited by 512
de DUVE, C. (1983) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07841.x · Cited by 445
Bacterial toxins: cellular mechanisms of action
Middlebrook, J. L., & Dorland, R. B. (1984) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.48.3.199-221.1984 · Cited by 357
Murphy, R. F., Powers, S., & Cantor, C. R. (1984) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.98.5.1757 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Draper, R. K., & Simon, M. I.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1980-12-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 849-854
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2096490954
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The entry of diphtheria toxin into the mammalian cell cytoplasm: evidence for lysosomal involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.87.3.849
- The paper
- Draper, R. K., & Simon, M. I. (1980). The entry of diphtheria toxin into the mammalian cell cytoplasm: evidence for lysosomal involvement. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.87.3.849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.