The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds.
Open accessAbstract
We have developed procedures for depositing intact mitotic chromosomes and isolated residual scaffolds on electron microscope grids at controlled and reproducible levels of compaction. The chromosomes were isolated using a recently developed aqueous method. Our study has addressed two different aspects of chromosome structure. First, we present a method for improved visualization of radial chromatin loops in undisrupted mitotic chromosomes. Second, we have visualized a nonhistone protein residual scaffold isolated from nuclease-digested chromosomes under conditions of low salt protein extraction. These scaffolds, which have an extremely simple protein composition, are the size of chromosomes, are fibrous in nature, and are found to retain differentiated regions that appear to derive from the kinetochores and the chromatid axis. When our standard preparation conditions were used, the scaffold appearance was found to be very reproducible. If the ionic conditions were varied, however, the scaffold appearance underwent dramatic changes. In the presence of millimolar concentrations of Mg++ or high concentrations of NaCl, the fibrous scaffold protein network was observed to undergo a lateral aggregation or assembly into a coarse meshlike structure. The alteration of scaffold structure was apparently reversible. This observation is consistent with a model in which the scaffolding network plays a dynamic role in chromosome condensation at mitosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Visualization of nucleolar genes
Miller, O. L., & Beatty, B. R. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.164.3882.955 · Cited by 876
Cited by
DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation
Bakkenist, C. J., & Kastan, M. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01368 · Cited by 3,466
Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Galluzzi, L., Humeau, J., Buqué, A., Zitvogel, L., & Kroemer, G. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0413-z · Cited by 1,349
Organization of the mitotic chromosome
Naumova, N., Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., Zhan, Y., Lajoie, B. R., Mirny, L. A., & Dekker, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236083 · Cited by 976
Wutz, G., Várnai, C., Nagasaka, K., Cisneros, D. A., Stocsits, R. R., Tang, W., Schoenfelder, S., Jessberger, G., Muhar, M., Hossain, M. J., et al. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798004 · Cited by 864
The 3D Genome as Moderator of Chromosomal Communication
Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.007 · Cited by 937
Metadata
- Authors
- Earnshaw, W. C., & Laemmli, U. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1983-01-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-93
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2105054597
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.96.1.84
- The paper
- Earnshaw, W. C., & Laemmli, U. K. (1983). Architecture of metaphase chromosomes and chromosome scaffolds. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.96.1.84
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.