The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MICROBIAL PERSISTENCE
Open accessAbstract
A previously reported form of microbial persistence whereby large populations of tubercle bacilli can be made to "vanish" uniformly from the tissues of mice has been shown to occur generally throughout each group of animals subjected to the experimental procedure; it does not reflect the eradication of the bacilli in the majority of animals with their persistence and ultimate revival in only a minority. The one demonstrable alteration of the tubercle bacilli while "vanished" is that they are sterile. Thus, they are undetectable by cell-free culture, tissue culture, and blind animal passage, i.e. by any method based on microbial multiplication. Whether they have also undergone alteration in morphology and persist in some unconventional form cannot be stated. Acid-fast forms similar to tubercle bacilli can be detected in small numbers by intensified microscopic search of tissue homogenates but the relationship of these forms to the sterile bacilli that ultimately revive is unclear. Thus, the persisting tubercle bacilli are more correctly designated as being in a "sterile state" than one of true latency. The uniform induction of the sterile state is a specific phenomenon requiring the participation of both the nicotinamide derivative, pyrazinamide, and isoniazid. Once assumed, this sterile state is relatively stable and the time required for revival of the tubercle bacilli in the spleens in one-half the animals is seven months. This process can be speeded up by the administration of large doses of cortisone in the third or fourth month after sterilization but revival is not significantly affected by the administration of cortisone earlier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutrition Needs of Mammalian Cells in Tissue Culture
Eagle, H. (1955) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.122.3168.501 · Cited by 1,619
Cited by
Identification of nitric oxide synthase as a protective locus against tuberculosis
MacMicking, J. D., North, R. J., LaCourse, R., Mudgett, J. S., Shah, S. K., & Nathan, C. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.10.5243 · Cited by 1,180
Nonreplicating Persistence of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
Wayne, L. G., & Sohaskey, C. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.139 · Cited by 807
Asymmetry and Aging of Mycobacterial Cells Lead to Variable Growth and Antibiotic Susceptibility
Aldridge, B. B., Fernandez-Suarez, M., Heller, D., Ambravaneswaran, V., Irimia, D., Toner, M., & Fortune, S. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216166 · Cited by 454
Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis–persistence, patience and winning by waiting
Manabe, Y. C., & Bishai, W. R. (2000) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/82139 · Cited by 275
Radaeva, T. V., Nikonenko, B. V., Mischenko, V. V., Averbakh, M. M., & Apt, A. S. (2005) · Tuberculosis · doi:10.1016/j.tube.2004.09.014 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- McCune, R. M., Feldmann, F. M., Lambert, H. P., & McDermott, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1966-03-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 445-468
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2152352130
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MICROBIAL PERSISTENCE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.123.3.445
- The paper
- McCune, R. M., Feldmann, F. M., Lambert, H. P., & McDermott, W. (1966). MICROBIAL PERSISTENCE. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.123.3.445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.