The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DISQUISITIONS ON ORIGINAL ANTIGENIC SIN
Open accessAbstract
When primary immunity is boosted not by the homologous but by a crossreacting vaccine, the newly formed antibodies react better with the primary antigen than with the antigen actually eliciting the response. This phenomenon bears the name of Original Antigenic Sin (1). It is shown that the number of antibody molecules produced against the original and the vaccinating antigen is the same; that each of these molecules is capable of reacting with both antigens; that the activity of an antiserum can be completely absorbed with either antigen; that both residual and adsorbed-dissociated fractions of antibody exhibit the same relative affinities towards the two antigens as did the native serum; that, unlike standard primary and secondary responses, the population of antibody molecules characterizing the Original Antigenic Sin is homogeneous; that each molecule has a lower equilibrium constant (i.e. higher avidity) against the original antigen than against the antigen stimulating the present response; and that all equilibrium constants are typical of secondary antibody. It is concluded that the Original Antigenic Sin is a partial anamnestic response, a related antigen stimulating that sector only of the originally primed cells which is destined to produce cross-reacting antibody. A hypothesis is developed according to which the basic difference between primary and secondary reactivity rests on the presence of a trapping mechanism that allows anamnestic production of antibody against lower doses of the homologous antigen. Such a mechanism is capable of cross-trapping related antigens, thus preventing a standard primary response and allowing manifestations of Original Antigenic Sin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fishman, M. (1961) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.114.6.837 · Cited by 442
Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., Francis, T., & Fabisch, W. T. T. A. O. P. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.98.6.641 · Cited by 399
INFLUENZA: THE NEWE ACQUAYANTANCE
FRANCIS, T. (1953) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-39-2-203 · Cited by 182
PREDETERMINATION BY INFECTION AND BY VACCINATION OF ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINES
Davenport, F. M., Hennessy, A. V., & Fabisch, W. T. T. A. O. P. H. (1957) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.106.6.835 · Cited by 88
Nisonoff, A., & Pressman, D. (1958) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.81.2.126 · Cited by 54
Cited by
New concepts in the generation and functions of IgA
Pabst, O. (2012) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3322 · Cited by 656
Antibodies, viruses and vaccines
Burton, D. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri891 · Cited by 637
Cancro, M. P. (2020) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-092419-031130 · Cited by 464
Enhanced virulence of influenza A viruses with the haemagglutinin of the 1918 pandemic virus
Kobasa, D., Takada, A., Shinya, K., Hatta, M., Halfmann, P., Theriault, S., Suzuki, H., Nishimura, H., Mitamura, K., Sugaya, N., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02951 · Cited by 455
Immunology and Evolution of Infectious Disease
Frank, S. A. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691220161 · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- de St.Groth, S. F., & Webster, R. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1966-09-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-345
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2146581768
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DISQUISITIONS ON ORIGINAL ANTIGENIC SIN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.124.3.331
- The paper
- de St.Groth, S. F., & Webster, R. G. (1966). DISQUISITIONS ON ORIGINAL ANTIGENIC SIN. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.124.3.331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.