The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two types of mouse helper T cell clone. III. Further differences in lymphokine synthesis between Th1 and Th2 clones revealed by RNA hybridization, functionally monospecific bioassays, and monoclonal antibodies.
Open accessAbstract
Lymphokine synthesis patterns of a panel of 19 T cell clones have been evaluated, using mRNA hybridization methods to examine 11 different mRNAs induced by Con A. The two types of CD4+ Th cell clone described previously were clearly distinguished by this procedure, and the differences between the two types have now been extended to six induced products. With minor exceptions, only Th1 clones synthesized mRNA for IL-2, IFN-gamma, and lymphotoxin, and only Th2 clones synthesized mRNA for IL-4, IL-5, and another induced gene, P600. Four more induced products were expressed preferentially but not uniquely by one or another type of clone: mRNAs for GM-CSF, TNF, and another induced, secreted product (TY5) were produced in larger amounts by Th1 clones, whereas preproenkephalin was preferentially expressed by Th2 clones. IL-3 was produced in similar amounts by both types of clone. mAbs were used to establish three bioassays that were functionally monospecific for IL-2, IL-3, and IL-4, and a new anti-IFN gamma mAb, XMG1.2, was used to establish an ELISA for IFN-gamma. These four assays were used to show that secreted protein and mRNA levels correlated well for all cell lines. The implications of these findings for normal T cells are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mosmann, T. R., & Coffman, R. L. (1989) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.07.040189.001045 · Cited by 7,692
Self-citationHeinzel, F. P., Sadick, M. D., Holaday, B. J., Coffman, R. L., & Locksley, R. M. (1989) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.169.1.59 · Cited by 1,454
The Central Role of CD4+ T Cells in the Antitumor Immune Response
Hung, K., Hayashi, R., Lafond-Walker, A., Lowenstein, C., Pardoll, D., & Levitsky, H. (1998) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.188.12.2357 · Cited by 1,345
Powrie, F., Leach, M. W., Mauze, S., Menon, S., Barcomb Caddle, L., & Coffman, R. L. (1994) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/1074-7613(94)90045-0 · Cited by 1,146
Regulation of antibody isotype secretion by subsets of antigen-specific helper T cells
Stevens, T. L., Bossie, A., Sanders, V. M., Fernandez-Botran, R., Coffman, R. L., Mosmann, T. R., & Vitetta, E. S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/334255a0 · Cited by 933
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cherwinski, H. M., Schumacher, J. H., Brown, K. D., & Mosmann, T. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1987-11-01
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1229-1244
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2005246059
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two types of mouse helper T cell clone. III. Further differences in lymphokine synthesis between Th1 and Th2 clones revealed by RNA hybridization, functionally monospecific bioassays, and monoclonal antibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.166.5.1229
- The paper
- Cherwinski, H. M., Schumacher, J. H., Brown, K. D., & Mosmann, T. R. (1987). Two types of mouse helper T cell clone. III. Further differences in lymphokine synthesis between Th1 and Th2 clones revealed by RNA hybridization, functionally monospecific bioassays, and monoclonal antibodies. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.166.5.1229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.