Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates wound healing in healing-impaired db/db mice.

Open access
Tsuboi, R, Rifkin, D B·1990·The Journal of experimental medicine

Abstract

The stimulatory effect of recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on wound healing was assessed using healing-impaired (db/db) mice. Full-thickness wounds were made in female diabetic C57BL/KsJ db/db mice, and their normal (db/+) littermates with a punch biopsy instrument. Recombinant bFGF was applied locally to the open wound once a day. The mice were later killed and histological sections of the wounds were prepared. The degree of wound healing was evaluated using several histological parameters such as degree of reepithelialization, granulation tissue thickness, matrix density, number of infiltrated cells, and number of capillaries. Wounds from normal mice displayed good reepithelialization rates and granulation tissue formation, while wounds from db/db mice had poor responses, especially in the dermal parameters. Although the application of bFGF to wounds in the normal (db/+) mice had little effect, application of bFGF to wounds in db/db mice induced significant responses in all of the dermal parameters compared with nontreated db/db mice (p less than 0.001). In the presence of bFGF, these parameters approximated those observed in nontreated littermates. A minimum of 0.5 microgram bFGF in either single or multiple applications was required for a significant effect. bFGF that was either boiled or pretreated with neutralizing antibody had little stimulatory effect. Time-course experiments indicated that the granulation response in bFGF-treated mice peaked between 8 and 12 d, and decreased after 12 d, while matrix density continued to increase until the 18th day (p less than 0.05). The breaking strength of healed linear wounds in db/db mice was also decreased when compared with heterozygous littermates. This parameter was also improved by the administration of bFGF to the wounds (p less than 0.05).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.172.1.245

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Tsuboi, R., & Rifkin, D. B.
Venue
The Journal of experimental medicine
Published
1990-07-01
Volume
172
Issue
1
Pages
245-251
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2115047729
Cited by
305
References
1
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates wound healing in healing-impaired db/db mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.172.1.245
The paper
Tsuboi, R., & Rifkin, D. B. (1990). Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates wound healing in healing-impaired db/db mice. The Journal of experimental medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.172.1.245

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.