The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Localization of Epstein-Barr virus cytotoxic T cell epitopes using recombinant vaccinia: implications for vaccine development.
Open accessAbstract
There is considerable interest in designing an effective vaccine to the ubiquitous Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). An important role for EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in eliminating virus-infected cells is well established. Limited studies using a small number of immune donors have defined target epitopes within the latent antigens of EBV. The present study provides an extensive analysis of the distribution of class I-restricted CTL epitopes within EBV-encoded proteins. Using recombinant vaccinia encoding individual EBV latent antigens (Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen [EBNA] 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 3C, LP, and LMP 1), we have successfully localized target epitopes recognized by CTL clones from a panel of 14 EBV-immune donors. Of the 20 CTL epitopes localized, five were defined at the peptide level. Although CTL clones specific for nine epitopes recognized both type 1 and type 2 transformants, a significant number of epitopes (7/16 epitopes for which EBV type specificity was determined) were detected only on type 1 EBV transformants. Vaccinia recombinants encoding EBNA 3A and EBNA 3C were recognized more frequently than any other vaccinia recombinants used in this study, while no CTL epitopes were localized in EBNA 1. Surprisingly, epitope specificity for a large number of EBV-specific CTL clones could not be localized, although vaccinia recombinants used in this study encoded most of the latent antigens of EBV. These results suggest that any EBV vaccine based on CTL epitopes designed to provide widespread protection will need to include not only latent antigen sequences but also other regions of the genome. The apparent inability of human CTLs to recognize EBNA 1 as a target antigen, often the only latent antigen expressed in Burkitt's lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, suggests that EBV-specific CTL control of these tumors will not be feasible unless the down-regulation of latent antigens can be reversed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Callan, M. F. C., Tan, L., Annels, N., Ogg, G. S., Wilson, J. D. K., O'Callaghan, C. A., Steven, N., McMichael, A. J., & Rickinson, A. B. (1998) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.187.9.1395 · Cited by 892
Cellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein–Barr virus
Hislop, A. D., Taylor, G. S., Sauce, D., & Rickinson, A. B. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141553 · Cited by 766
The Critical Need for CD4 Help in Maintaining Effective Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses
Kalams, S. A., & Walker, B. D. (1998) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.188.12.2199 · Cited by 660
Sutkowski, N., Chen, G., Calderon, G., & Huber, B. T. (2004) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.78.14.7852-7860.2004 · Cited by 98
Taylor, G. S., Long, H. M., Haigh, T. A., Larsen, M., Brooks, J., & Rickinson, A. B. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3746 · Cited by 69
Bihl, F. K., Loggi, E., Chisholm, J. V., Hewitt, H. S., Henry, L. M., Linde, C., Suscovich, T. J., Wong, J. T., Frahm, N., Andreone, P., et al. (2005) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/1479-5876-3-20 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Khanna, R., Burrows, S. R., Kurilla, M. G., Jacob, C. A., Misko, I. S., Sculley, T. B., Kieff, E., & Moss, D. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of experimental medicine
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-176
- ISSN
- 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9538
- OpenAlex
- W2144046117
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.