Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transferrin receptor (TfR) trafficking determines brain uptake of TfR antibody affinity variants

Open access
Bien-Ly, Nga, Yu, Y. Joy, Bumbaca, Daniela, Elstrott, Justin, Boswell, C. Andrew, Zhang, Yin, Luk, Wilman, Lu, Yanmei, Dennis, Mark S., Weimer, Robby M., Chung, Inhee, Watts, Ryan J.·2014·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Antibodies to transferrin receptor (TfR) have potential use for therapeutic entry into the brain. We have shown that bispecific antibodies against TfR and β-secretase (BACE1 [β-amyloid cleaving enzyme-1]) traverse the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and effectively reduce brain amyloid β levels. We found that optimizing anti-TfR affinity improves brain exposure and BACE1 inhibition. Here we probe the cellular basis of this improvement and explore whether TfR antibody affinity alters the intracellular trafficking of TfR. Comparing high- and low-affinity TfR bispecific antibodies in vivo, we found that high-affinity binding to TfR caused a dose-dependent reduction of brain TfR levels. In vitro live imaging and colocalization experiments revealed that high-affinity TfR bispecific antibodies facilitated the trafficking of TfR to lysosomes and thus induced the degradation of TfR, an observation which was further confirmed in vivo. Importantly, high-affinity anti-TfR dosing induced reductions in brain TfR levels, which significantly decreased brain exposure to a second dose of low-affinity anti-TfR bispecific. Thus, high-affinity anti-TfR alters TfR trafficking, which dramatically impacts the capacity for TfR to mediate BBB transcytosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20131660

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Bien-Ly, N., Yu, Y. J., Bumbaca, D., Elstrott, J., Boswell, C. A., Zhang, Y., Luk, W., Lu, Y., Dennis, M. S., Weimer, R. M., Chung, I., & Watts, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2014-01-27
Volume
211
Issue
2
Pages
233-244
ISSN
  • 0022-1007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9538
OpenAlex
W2100276489
Cited by
353
References
25
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transferrin receptor (TfR) trafficking determines brain uptake of TfR antibody affinity variants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1084/jem.20131660
The paper
Bien-Ly, N., Yu, Y. J., Bumbaca, D., Elstrott, J., Boswell, C. A., Zhang, Y., Luk, W., Lu, Y., Dennis, M. S., Weimer, R. M., Chung, I., & Watts, R. J. (2014). Transferrin receptor (TfR) trafficking determines brain uptake of TfR antibody affinity variants. Journal of Experimental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20131660

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.