Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A loss-of-function IFNAR1 allele in Polynesia underlies severe viral diseases in homozygotes

Bastard, Paul, Hsiao, Kuang-Chih, Zhang, Qian, Choin, Jeremy, Best, Emma, Chen, Jie, Gervais, Adrian, Bizien, Lucy, Materna, Marie, Harmant, Christine, Roux, Maguelonne, Hawley, Nicola L., Weeks, Daniel E., McGarvey, Stephen T., Sandoval, Karla, Barberena-Jonas, Carmina, Quinto-Cortés, Consuelo D., Hagelberg, Erika, Mentzer, Alexander J., Robson, Kathryn, Coulibaly, Boubacar, Seeleuthner, Yoann, Bigio, Benedetta, Li, Zhi, Uzé, Gilles, Pellegrini, Sandra, Lorenzo, Lazaro, Sbihi, Zineb, Latour, Sylvain, Besnard, Marianne, Adam de Beaumais, Tiphaine, Jacqz Aigrain, Evelyne, Béziat, Vivien, Deka, Ranjan, Esera Tulifau, Litara, Viali, Satupa‘itea, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Naseri, Take, McNaughton, Peter, Sarkozy, Vanessa, Peake, Jane, Blincoe, Annaliesse, Primhak, Sarah, Stables, Simon, Gibson, Kate, Woon, See-Tarn, Drake, Kylie Marie, Hill, Adrian V.S., Chan, Cheng-Yee, King, Richard, Ameratunga, Rohan, Teiti, Iotefa, Aubry, Maite, Cao-Lormeau, Van-Mai, Tangye, Stuart G., Zhang, Shen-Ying, Jouanguy, Emmanuelle, Gray, Paul, Abel, Laurent, Moreno-Estrada, Andrés, Minster, Ryan L., Quintana-Murci, Lluis, Wood, Andrew C., Casanova, Jean-Laurent·2022·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Globally, autosomal recessive IFNAR1 deficiency is a rare inborn error of immunity underlying susceptibility to live attenuated vaccine and wild-type viruses. We report seven children from five unrelated kindreds of western Polynesian ancestry who suffered from severe viral diseases. All the patients are homozygous for the same nonsense IFNAR1 variant (p.Glu386*). This allele encodes a truncated protein that is absent from the cell surface and is loss-of-function. The fibroblasts of the patients do not respond to type I IFNs (IFN-α2, IFN-ω, or IFN-β). Remarkably, this IFNAR1 variant has a minor allele frequency >1% in Samoa and is also observed in the Cook, Society, Marquesas, and Austral islands, as well as Fiji, whereas it is extremely rare or absent in the other populations tested, including those of the Pacific region. Inherited IFNAR1 deficiency should be considered in individuals of Polynesian ancestry with severe viral illnesses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20220028

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Homozygous pLOF IFNAR1 variant in Polynesians with adverse events after LAV vaccination. (A) Family pedigree showing the segregation of the IFNAR1 p.Glu386* allele in the seven patients from five kindreds. The proband is indicated by an arrow. E?, unknown IFNAR1 genotype. (B) The giant multinucleated WFCs (identified by black arrows) in the lung (upper panel) and LNs (lower panel) of P1 are pathognomic of measles infection (Laksono et al., 2016). WFC was determined for the tonsils and adenoids during prodromal measles (Nozawa et al., 1994) and in the regional LNs after immunization and after fatal measles infection (Becroft and Osborne, 1980). Scale bar represents 400 µm. (C) Sanger sequencing results for IFNAR1 in leukocyte gDNA from the patients, their parents, and healthy controls. (D) Schematic diagram of the WT and mutant (MT) IFNAR1 proteins. SD1–4, extracellular subdomains 1–4; SP, signal peptide; TM, transmembrane region. The mutation reported here is indicated in red, and the previously reported mutations are indicated in violet.
Figure 1. Homozygous pLOF IFNAR1 variant in Polynesians with adverse events after LAV vaccination. (A) Family pedigree showing the segregation of the IFNAR1 p.Glu386* allele in the seven patients from five kindreds. The proband is indicated by an arrow. E?, unknown IFNAR1 genotype. (B) The giant multinucleated WFCs (identified by black arrows) in the lung (upper panel) and LNs (lower panel) of P1 are pathognomic of measles infection (Laksono et al., 2016). WFC was determined for the tonsils and adenoids during prodromal measles (Nozawa et al., 1994) and in the regional LNs after immunization and after fatal measles infection (Becroft and Osborne, 1980). Scale bar represents 400 µm. (C) Sanger sequencing results for IFNAR1 in leukocyte gDNA from the patients, their parents, and healthy controls. (D) Schematic diagram of the WT and mutant (MT) IFNAR1 proteins. SD1–4, extracellular subdomains 1–4; SP, signal peptide; TM, transmembrane region. The mutation reported here is indicated in red, and the previously reported mutations are indicated in violet.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S1. Genetic analysis of P1. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) for P1. Although there are no Polynesians included in the PCA for triangulation of P1’s ancestry, individuals of Polynesian ancestry often locate on visualizations of the first and second principal components adjacent to East Asian samples (Minster et al., 2016). (B) Filtering criteria used for the single-nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis of WES results for P1. CADD, combined annotation-dependent depletion; GDI, gene damage index.
Figure S1. Genetic analysis of P1. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) for P1. Although there are no Polynesians included in the PCA for triangulation of P1’s ancestry, individuals of Polynesian ancestry often locate on visualizations of the first and second principal components adjacent to East Asian samples (Minster et al., 2016). (B) Filtering criteria used for the single-nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis of WES results for P1. CADD, combined annotation-dependent depletion; GDI, gene damage index.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S2. XIAP p.Gly113Arg, carried by P1 and P2, is neutral. (A) Pedigrees of families with XIAP variant (kindred A, P1, and P2 shown). Black boxes represent subjects affected by HLH-like. Diagonal bars indicate deceased subjects. (B) Sanger sequencing results for XIAP for P1 and P2 of kindred A, the parents, and healthy control leukocyte gDNA. (C) Lyonization in P1’s and mother’s gDNA. (D) Normal expression of XIAP by flow cytometry in CD3+ cells, a control, the mother of P1, and a XIAP-deficient patient. (E) Normal production of TNF-α in response to NOD2 stimulation by muramyl dipeptide (MDP) in monocytes from a control and the mother of P1, while it is defective in a XIAP-deficient patient. Bar graphs showing percentage of monocytes expressing TNFα from intracellular staining data. (F) Normal activation-induced cell death in response to anti-CD3, assessed by Annexin V staining, in T cells from a control and the mother of P1, while it is increased in a XIAP-deficient patient.
Figure S2. XIAP p.Gly113Arg, carried by P1 and P2, is neutral. (A) Pedigrees of families with XIAP variant (kindred A, P1, and P2 shown). Black boxes represent subjects affected by HLH-like. Diagonal bars indicate deceased subjects. (B) Sanger sequencing results for XIAP for P1 and P2 of kindred A, the parents, and healthy control leukocyte gDNA. (C) Lyonization in P1’s and mother’s gDNA. (D) Normal expression of XIAP by flow cytometry in CD3+ cells, a control, the mother of P1, and a XIAP-deficient patient. (E) Normal production of TNF-α in response to NOD2 stimulation by muramyl dipeptide (MDP) in monocytes from a control and the mother of P1, while it is defective in a XIAP-deficient patient. Bar graphs showing percentage of monocytes expressing TNFα from intracellular staining data. (F) Normal activation-induced cell death in response to anti-CD3, assessed by Annexin V staining, in T cells from a control and the mother of P1, while it is increased in a XIAP-deficient patient.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. The IFNAR1 p.Glu386* variant results in a truncated protein that is not expressed at cell surface and is loss-of-function. (A) IFNAR1 mRNA levels, determined by RT-qPCR, in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with WT or MT IFNAR1 cDNA constructs; β glucuronidase (GUS) was used as an expression control. EV, empty vector; NT, nontransfected; p.V225fs variant from a previously reported IFNAR1−/− patient. Error bars indicate SD. (B) Western blot of IFNAR1 in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with WT and mutant IFNAR1 cDNA constructs. An antibody recognizing the IFNAR1 protein was used. GAPDH was used as a loading control. One blot representative of two independent experiments is shown. (C) Immunofluorescence staining as assessed by confocal microscopy in HeLa cells transiently transfected with IFNAR1 cDNA constructs. An antibody against the N-terminus of IFNAR1 was used (green), and membranes were stained with wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA; purple). The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 10 µm. The images shown are representative of two independent experiments. (D) Graphical representation of extracellular FACS staining and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for IFNAR1 in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with IFNAR1 cDNA constructs, performed with an antibody recognizing the N-terminus of the protein. Cells were not permeabilized. Results representative of three independent experiments are shown. Error bars indicate the SD. (E) Luciferase activity after IFN-α2 stimulation in IFNAR1−/− HEK293T cells generated with CRISPR/Cas-9 technology and transiently transfected with WT or MT IFNAR1 cDNA constructs. The bars represent the means and SEM of the results obtained in three independent experiments. Ctrl, control; RLU, relative light units. Source data are available for this figure: SourceData F2.
Figure 2. The IFNAR1 p.Glu386* variant results in a truncated protein that is not expressed at cell surface and is loss-of-function. (A) IFNAR1 mRNA levels, determined by RT-qPCR, in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with WT or MT IFNAR1 cDNA constructs; β glucuronidase (GUS) was used as an expression control. EV, empty vector; NT, nontransfected; p.V225fs variant from a previously reported IFNAR1−/− patient. Error bars indicate SD. (B) Western blot of IFNAR1 in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with WT and mutant IFNAR1 cDNA constructs. An antibody recognizing the IFNAR1 protein was used. GAPDH was used as a loading control. One blot representative of two independent experiments is shown. (C) Immunofluorescence staining as assessed by confocal microscopy in HeLa cells transiently transfected with IFNAR1 cDNA constructs. An antibody against the N-terminus of IFNAR1 was used (green), and membranes were stained with wheatgerm agglutinin (WGA; purple). The nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 10 µm. The images shown are representative of two independent experiments. (D) Graphical representation of extracellular FACS staining and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for IFNAR1 in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with IFNAR1 cDNA constructs, performed with an antibody recognizing the N-terminus of the protein. Cells were not permeabilized. Results representative of three independent experiments are shown. Error bars indicate the SD. (E) Luciferase activity after IFN-α2 stimulation in IFNAR1−/− HEK293T cells generated with CRISPR/Cas-9 technology and transiently transfected with WT or MT IFNAR1 cDNA constructs. The bars represent the means and SEM of the results obtained in three independent experiments. Ctrl, control; RLU, relative light units. Source data are available for this figure: SourceData F2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Patient SV40-fibroblasts do not express IFNAR1 at the cell surface and do not respond to IFN-α/β. (A) IFNAR1 mRNA levels in SV40-fibroblasts from three healthy controls (C1, C2, C3), P3, and the previously reported p.V225fs IFNAR1−/− patient; GUS was used as an expression control. Mean values and SD from two independent experiments, each with technical duplicates, are shown. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) following extracellular FACS staining of IFNAR1 in SV40-fibroblasts from three healthy controls (C1, C2, and C3), P3, and a previously reported IFNAR1−/− patient. Cells were not permeabilized. An antibody recognizing the N-terminal part of the protein was used. (C) Intracellular FACS staining of p-STAT1 in SV40-fibroblasts stimulated with 100 ng/ml IFN-α2, or IFN-γ for 15 min, in two healthy controls (C1 and C2), P3, and a previously reported IFNAR1−/− patient. (D) Fold-change in MX1 mRNA levels after 6 h of stimulation with IFN-α2b, IFN-β, IFN-ω, or IFN-γ, in SV40-fibroblasts from two healthy controls (C1 and C2), P3, and IFNAR1−/− patients. The GUS housekeeping gene was used as an expression control. The mean and SD values from two independent experiments are shown. (E) Fold-change in MX1 mRNA levels after stimulation for 6 h with IFN-α2b, IFN-β, or IFN-ω in SV40-fibroblasts from P3, transfected on the previous day with empty vector, MT, or WT IFNAR1 plasmids. The GUS housekeeping gene was used as an expression control. Mean and SD values from two independent experiments are shown.
Figure 3. Patient SV40-fibroblasts do not express IFNAR1 at the cell surface and do not respond to IFN-α/β. (A) IFNAR1 mRNA levels in SV40-fibroblasts from three healthy controls (C1, C2, C3), P3, and the previously reported p.V225fs IFNAR1−/− patient; GUS was used as an expression control. Mean values and SD from two independent experiments, each with technical duplicates, are shown. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) following extracellular FACS staining of IFNAR1 in SV40-fibroblasts from three healthy controls (C1, C2, and C3), P3, and a previously reported IFNAR1−/− patient. Cells were not permeabilized. An antibody recognizing the N-terminal part of the protein was used. (C) Intracellular FACS staining of p-STAT1 in SV40-fibroblasts stimulated with 100 ng/ml IFN-α2, or IFN-γ for 15 min, in two healthy controls (C1 and C2), P3, and a previously reported IFNAR1−/− patient. (D) Fold-change in MX1 mRNA levels after 6 h of stimulation with IFN-α2b, IFN-β, IFN-ω, or IFN-γ, in SV40-fibroblasts from two healthy controls (C1 and C2), P3, and IFNAR1−/− patients. The GUS housekeeping gene was used as an expression control. The mean and SD values from two independent experiments are shown. (E) Fold-change in MX1 mRNA levels after stimulation for 6 h with IFN-α2b, IFN-β, or IFN-ω in SV40-fibroblasts from P3, transfected on the previous day with empty vector, MT, or WT IFNAR1 plasmids. The GUS housekeeping gene was used as an expression control. Mean and SD values from two independent experiments are shown.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S3. Normal IFNAR2 expression and impaired response to type I IFNs in the patient's cells. (A) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) following extracellular FACS staining of IFNAR2 in SV40-fibroblasts from two healthy controls (C1 and C2), P3, and a previously reported IFNAR2−/− patient. Cells were not permeabilized. An antibody recognizing the N-terminal part of the protein was used. (B) Fold-change in CXCL9 mRNA levels after stimulation for 6 h with IFN-α2b, IFN-β, or IFN-ω in SV40-fibroblasts from P3, transfected on the previous day with empty vector, MT, or WT IFNAR1 plasmids. The GUS housekeeping gene was used as an expression control. Mean and SD values from two independent experiments are shown.
Figure S3. Normal IFNAR2 expression and impaired response to type I IFNs in the patient's cells. (A) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) following extracellular FACS staining of IFNAR2 in SV40-fibroblasts from two healthy controls (C1 and C2), P3, and a previously reported IFNAR2−/− patient. Cells were not permeabilized. An antibody recognizing the N-terminal part of the protein was used. (B) Fold-change in CXCL9 mRNA levels after stimulation for 6 h with IFN-α2b, IFN-β, or IFN-ω in SV40-fibroblasts from P3, transfected on the previous day with empty vector, MT, or WT IFNAR1 plasmids. The GUS housekeeping gene was used as an expression control. Mean and SD values from two independent experiments are shown.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S4. Population genetics of homozygous coding missense IFNAR1 variants present in gnomAD v2.1. The patient’s variant is shown in red, whereas the variants present in gnomAD are shown in black. Dotted line represents the gene damage index. CADD, combined annotation-dependent depletion.
Figure S4. Population genetics of homozygous coding missense IFNAR1 variants present in gnomAD v2.1. The patient’s variant is shown in red, whereas the variants present in gnomAD are shown in black. Dotted line represents the gene damage index. CADD, combined annotation-dependent depletion.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. The p.Glu386* variant is extremely rare or absent in most regions of the world tested, but frequent in western Polynesia. Map showing the frequency distribution of the two alleles (c.1156G>T) in different Pacific and continental populations (Europeans [non-Finnish] and East Asians from gnomADv3.2.1; Karczewski et al., 2020), and Pacific populations including Taiwanese indigenous peoples, Philippine populations, and ni-Vanuatu (Choin et al., 2021); New Guineans and Bougainville islanders (Bergstrom et al., 2020); Polynesians from Samoa (the Soifua Manuia study; Harris et al., 2020); and populations from Fiji, Tonga, and the Cook, Society, Austral, Tuamotu, Gambier, and Marquesas Islands. To aid visualization of the variant distribution, a factor 10 correction has been applied to allele frequencies, so that a full pie chart corresponds to MAF = 10% and a quarter of a pie chart to MAF = 2.5% (as denoted in the schematic legend).
Figure 4. The p.Glu386* variant is extremely rare or absent in most regions of the world tested, but frequent in western Polynesia. Map showing the frequency distribution of the two alleles (c.1156G>T) in different Pacific and continental populations (Europeans [non-Finnish] and East Asians from gnomADv3.2.1; Karczewski et al., 2020), and Pacific populations including Taiwanese indigenous peoples, Philippine populations, and ni-Vanuatu (Choin et al., 2021); New Guineans and Bougainville islanders (Bergstrom et al., 2020); Polynesians from Samoa (the Soifua Manuia study; Harris et al., 2020); and populations from Fiji, Tonga, and the Cook, Society, Austral, Tuamotu, Gambier, and Marquesas Islands. To aid visualization of the variant distribution, a factor 10 correction has been applied to allele frequencies, so that a full pie chart corresponds to MAF = 10% and a quarter of a pie chart to MAF = 2.5% (as denoted in the schematic legend).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Abolhassani, 2022, Inherited IFNAR1 deficiency in a child with both critical COVID-19 pneumonia and multisystem inflammatory syndrome, J. Clin. Immunol., 1, 10.1007/s10875-022-01215-7 · DOI
  2. Amatuni, 2019, Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and T-cell lymphopenia in California, 2010-2017, Pediatrics, 143, 10.1542/peds.2018-2300 · DOI
  3. Bastard, 2021, Autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs are present in ∼4% of uninfected individuals over 70 years old and account for ∼20% of COVID-19 deaths, Sci. Immunol., 6, 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl4340 · DOI
  4. Bastard, 2021, Herpes simplex encephalitis in a patient with a distinctive form of inherited IFNAR1 deficiency, J. Clin. Invest., 131, 10.1172/jci139980 · DOI
  5. Bastard, 2021, Auto-antibodies to type I IFNs can underlie adverse reactions to yellow fever live attenuated vaccine, J. Exp. Med., 218, 10.1084/jem.20202486 · DOI
  6. Becroft, 1980, The lungs in fatal measles infection in childhood: Pathological, radiological and immunological correlations, Histopathology, 4, 401, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1980.tb02935.x · DOI
  7. Biggs, 2017, Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: A primer for clinicians, CMAJ, 189, E1551, 10.1503/cmaj.170561 · DOI
  8. Bousfiha, 2020, Human inborn errors of immunity: 2019 update of the IUIS phenotypical classification, J. Clin. Immunol., 40, 66, 10.1007/s10875-020-00758-x · DOI
  9. Casanova, 2021, Mechanisms of viral inflammation and disease in humans, Science, 374, 1080, 10.1126/science.abj7965 · DOI
  10. Champredon, 2020, Curbing the 2019 Samoa measles outbreak, Lancet Infect. Dis., 20, 287, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30044-X · DOI
  11. Choin, 2021, Genomic insights into population history and biological adaptation in Oceania, Nature, 592, 583, 10.1038/s41586-021-03236-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Craig, 2020, Measles epidemic in Samoa and other Pacific islands, Lancet Infect. Dis., 20, 273, 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30053-0 · DOI
  13. Davies, 1894, Epidemic measles at Samoa, Br. Med. J., 1, 1077, 10.1136/bmj.1.1742.1077 · DOI
  14. Duncan, 2015, Human IFNAR2 deficiency: Lessons for antiviral immunity, Sci. Transl Med., 7, 307ra154, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac4227 · DOI
  15. Duncan, 2021, Genetic lesions of type I interferon signalling in human antiviral immunity, Trends Genet., 37, 46, 10.1016/j.tig.2020.08.017 · DOI
  16. Dupuis, 2003, Impaired response to interferon-alpha/beta and lethal viral disease in human STAT1 deficiency, Nat. Genet., 33, 388, 10.1038/ng1097 · DOI
  17. Eletto, 2016, Biallelic JAK1 mutations in immunodeficient patient with mycobacterial infection, Nat. Commun., 7, 13992, 10.1038/ncomms13992 · DOI
  18. Gothe, 2022, A novel case of homozygous interferon alpha/beta receptor alpha chain (IFNAR1) deficiency with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, Clin. Infect. Dis., 74, 136, 10.1093/cid/ciaa1790 · DOI
  19. Gothe, 2021, Monogenic susceptibility to live viral vaccines, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 72, 167, 10.1016/j.coi.2021.05.006 · DOI
  20. Griffith, 2020, Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity, Nat. Commun., 11, 5749, 10.1038/s41467-020-19478-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hambleton, 2013, STAT2 deficiency and susceptibility to viral illness in humans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 3053, 10.1073/pnas.1220098110 · DOI
  22. Harris, 2020, Evolutionary history of modern Samoans, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 9458, 10.1073/pnas.1913157117 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hawley, 2014, Prevalence of adiposity and associated cardiometabolic risk factors in the Samoan genome-wide association study, Am. J. Hum. Biol., 26, 491, 10.1002/ajhb.22553 · DOI
  24. Hernandez, 2019, Inherited IFNAR1 deficiency in otherwise healthy patients with adverse reaction to measles and yellow fever live vaccines, J. Exp. Med., 216, 2057, 10.1084/jem.20182295 · DOI
  25. Hernandez, 2018, Life-threatening influenza pneumonitis in a child with inherited IRF9 deficiency, J. Exp. Med., 215, 2567, 10.1084/jem.20180628 · DOI
  26. Ioannidis, 2020, Native American gene flow into Polynesia predating Easter Island settlement, Nature, 583, 572, 10.1038/s41586-020-2487-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Karczewski, 2020, The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans, Nature, 581, 434, 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Khanmohammadi, 2022, A case of autosomal recessive interferon alpha/beta receptor alpha chain (IFNAR1) deficiency with severe COVID-19, J. Clin. Immunol., 42, 19, 10.1007/s10875-021-01166-5 · DOI
  29. Kreins, 2015, Human TYK2 deficiency: Mycobacterial and viral infections without hyper-IgE syndrome, J. Exp. Med., 212, 1641, 10.1084/jem.20140280 · DOI
  30. Kwan, 2014, Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in 11 screening programs in the United States, JAMA, 312, 729, 10.1001/jama.2014.9132 · DOI
  31. Laksono, 2016, Measles virus host invasion and pathogenesis, Viruses, 8, 210, 10.3390/v8080210 · DOI
  32. Loirat, 2010, Autism in three patients with cystic or hyperechogenic kidneys and chromosome 17q12 deletion, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., 25, 3430, 10.1093/ndt/gfq380 · DOI
  33. Meyts, 2021, Viral infections in humans and mice with genetic deficiencies of the type I IFN response pathway, Eur. J. Immunol., 51, 1039, 10.1002/eji.202048793 · DOI
  34. Minegishi, 2006, Human tyrosine kinase 2 deficiency reveals its requisite roles in multiple cytokine signals involved in innate and acquired immunity, Immunity, 25, 745, 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.09.009 · DOI
  35. Minster, 2016, A thrifty variant in CREBRF strongly influences body mass index in Samoans, Nat. Genet., 48, 1049, 10.1038/ng.3620 · DOI
  36. Nagamani, 2010, Clinical spectrum associated with recurrent genomic rearrangements in chromosome 17q12, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 18, 278, 10.1038/ejhg.2009.174 · DOI
  37. NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine, 2021, TOPMed Whole Genome Sequencing Methods: Freeze 9
  38. Notarangelo, 2020, Human inborn errors of immunity: An expanding universe, Sci. Immunol., 5, 10.1126/sciimmunol.abb1662 · DOI
  39. Nozawa, 1994, An immunohistochemical study of Warthin-Finkeldey cells in measles, Pathol. Int., 44, 442, 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1994.tb01708.x · DOI
  40. Passarelli, 2020, IFNAR2 deficiency causing dysregulation of NK cell functions and presenting with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, Front. Genet., 11, 937, 10.3389/fgene.2020.00937 · DOI
  41. Petchey, 2001, Radiocarbon determinations from the Mulifanua Lapita site, Upolu, Western Samoa, Radiocarbon, 43, 63, 10.1017/s0033822200031635 · DOI
  42. Poyhonen, 2019, Life-threatening infections due to live-attenuated vaccines: Early manifestations of inborn errors of immunity, J. Clin. Immunol., 39, 376, 10.1007/s10875-019-00642-3 · DOI
  43. Quintana-Murci, 2019, Human immunology through the lens of evolutionary genetics, Cell, 177, 184, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.033 · DOI
  44. Quintana-Murci, 2007, Immunology in natura: Clinical, epidemiological and evolutionary genetics of infectious diseases, Nat. Immunol., 8, 1165, 10.1038/ni1535 · DOI
  45. Sirugo, 2019, The missing diversity in human genetic studies, Cell, 177, 1080, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.032 · DOI
  46. Staples, 2013, Utilizing graph theory to select the largest set of unrelated individuals for genetic analysis, Genet. Epidemiol., 37, 136, 10.1002/gepi.21684 · DOI
  47. Taliun, 2021, Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program, Nature, 590, 290, 10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y · DOI · Paper page
  48. Tangye, 2020, Human inborn errors of immunity: 2019 update on the Classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee, J. Clin. Immunol., 40, 24, 10.1007/s10875-019-00737-x · DOI
  49. Zhang, 2018, A proline deletion in IFNAR1 impairs IFN-signaling and underlies increased resistance to tuberculosis in humans, Nat. Commun., 9, 85, 10.1038/s41467-017-02611-z · DOI
  50. Zhang, 2020, Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19, Science, 370, 10.1126/science.abd4570 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bastard, P., Hsiao, K.-C., Zhang, Q., Choin, J., Best, E., Chen, J., Gervais, A., Bizien, L., Materna, M., Harmant, C., Roux, M., Hawley, N. L., Weeks, D. E., McGarvey, S. T., Sandoval, K., Barberena-Jonas, C., Quinto-Cortés, C. D., Hagelberg, E., Mentzer, A. J., Robson, K., Coulibaly, B., Seeleuthner, Y., Bigio, B., Li, Z., Uzé, G., Pellegrini, S., Lorenzo, L., Sbihi, Z., Latour, S., Besnard, M., Adam de Beaumais, T., Jacqz Aigrain, E., Béziat, V., Deka, R., Esera Tulifau, L., Viali, S., Reupena, M. S., Naseri, T., McNaughton, P., Sarkozy, V., Peake, J., Blincoe, A., Primhak, S., Stables, S., Gibson, K., Woon, S.-T., Drake, K. M., Hill, A. V. S., Chan, C.-Y., King, R., Ameratunga, R., Teiti, I., Aubry, M., Cao-Lormeau, V.-M., Tangye, S. G., Zhang, S.-Y., Jouanguy, E., Gray, P., Abel, L., Moreno-Estrada, A., Minster, R. L., Quintana-Murci, L., Wood, A. C., & Casanova, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Necker Branch, INSERM U1163, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France 1
  • Starship Child Health, Auckland, New Zealand 5
  • Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR2000, Human Evolutionary Genetics Unit, Paris, France 9
  • St. Giles Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, Rockefeller Branch, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 2
  • Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 14
  • Department of Human Genetics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 16
  • International Health Institute, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 15
  • National Laboratory of Genomics for Biodiversity (LANGEBIO) - UGA, CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico 19
  • Department of Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 20
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 21
  • MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 23
  • Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Biotherapy, Université Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, Montpellier, France 25
  • Unit of Cytokine Signaling, Pasteur Institute, INSERM U1224, Paris, France 24
  • Laboratory of Lymphocyte Activation and Susceptibility to EBV Infection, INSERM UMR 1163, Imagine Institute, Paris, France 26
  • Paris Cité University, Imagine Institute, Paris, France 3
  • Department of Neonatology, Centre Hospitalier de Polynésie Française, Papeete, French Polynesia 27
  • Precision Cancer Medicine Team, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France 28
  • Paris Cité University, Paris, France 11
  • Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 30
  • Tupua Tamasese Meaole Hospital, Apia, Samoa 31
  • School of Medicine, National University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa 32
  • Lutia i Puava ae Mapu i Fagalele, Apia, Samoa 33
  • Clinical Immunogenomics Research Consortium Australasia, Sydney, Australia 8
  • Tumbatin Developmental Services, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia 36
  • Department of Forensic Pathology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 38
  • Clinical Geneticist, South Island Hub, Genetic Health Service, Christchurch, New Zealand 39
  • Department of Virology and Immunology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand 40
  • Molecular Pathology, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand 42
  • Chemical Pathology and Genetics, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand 44
  • Laboratory of Research on Infectious Vector-borne Diseases, Institut Louis Malardé, Papeete, French Polynesia 46
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2022-04-20
Volume
219
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0022-1007
  • 1540-9538
Cited by
70
References
6
Language
en
Funders
  • MATAEA (03557/MED/REC_29/05/2019)
  • Institut Pasteur
  • Collège de France
  • Centre national de la recherche scientifique
  • Fondation Allianz-Institut de France
  • French Government’s Investissement d’Avenir program
  • Milieu Intérieur (ANR-10-LABX-69-01)
  • Fondation de France (00106080)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (Equipe FRM DEQ20180339214, EQU201903007798, EA20170638020)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Rockefeller University
  • St. Giles Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AI088364, R01AI163029, R01-HL093093, R01-HL133040)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award (UL1 TR001866)
  • Emergent Ventures
  • Mercatus Center at George Mason University
  • Yale Center for Mendelian Genomics
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG006504, U24HG008956)
  • Yale High-Performance Computing Center (S10OD018521)
  • Fisher Center for Alzheimer’s Research Foundation
  • Meyer Foundation
  • French National Research Agency (ANR-10-IAHU-01)
  • Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory of Excellence (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID)
  • FRM and ANR GENCOVID project
  • ANRS-COV05
  • ANR GENVIR (ANR-20-CE93-003)
  • ANR AABIFNCOV (ANR-20-CO11-0001)
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (824110)
  • Square Foundation
  • Grandir - Fonds de solidarité pour l’enfance
  • Fondation du Souffle
  • SCOR Corporate Foundation for Science
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • French Ministry of Higher Education, Research, and Innovation
  • University of Paris
  • Imagine Institute
  • Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Technologia (FONCICYT/50/2016)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N028937/1)
  • International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CRP/MEX20-01)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1176665)
  • John Brown Cook Foundation
  • National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  • Northwest Genomics Center (HHSN268201100037C)
  • New York Genome Center (HHSN268201500016C)
  • TOPMed Informatics Research Center (3R01-HL117626-02S1, HHSN268201800002I)
  • TOPMed Data Coordinating Center (01-HL120393, U01-HL120393, HHSN268201800001I)
  • Jeffrey Modell Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review