The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activation of Shaker Potassium Channels
Open accessAbstract
A functional kinetic model is developed to describe the activation gating process of the Shaker potassium channel. The modeling in this paper is constrained by measurements described in the preceding two papers, including macroscopic ionic and gating currents and single channel ionic currents. These data were obtained from the normally activating wild-type channel as well as a mutant channel V2, in which the leucine at position 382 has been mutated to a valine. Different classes of models that incorporate Shaker's symmetrical tetrameric structure are systematically examined. Many simple gating models are clearly inadequate, but a model that can account for all of the qualitative features of the data has the channel open after its four subunits undergo three transitions in sequence, and two final transitions that reflect the concerted action of the four subunits. In this model, which we call Scheme 3+2′, the channel can also close to several states that are not part of the activation path. Channel opening involves a large total charge movement (10.8 e0), which is distributed among a large number of small steps each with rather small charge movements (between 0.6 and 1.05 e0). The final two transitions are different from earlier steps by having slow backward rates. These steps confer a cooperative mechanism of channel opening at Shaker's activation voltages. In the context of Scheme 3+2′, significant effects of the V2 mutation are limited to the backward rates of the final two transitions, implying that L382 plays an important role in the conformational stability of the final two states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Cited by
Mechanism of Voltage Gating in Potassium Channels
Jensen, M. Ø., Jogini, V., Borhani, D. W., Leffler, A. E., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216533 · Cited by 606
Atomic scale movement of the voltage-sensing region in a potassium channel measured via spectroscopy
Cha, A., Snyder, G. E., Selvin, P. R., & Bezanilla, F. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/45552 · Cited by 473
A Gating Charge Transfer Center in Voltage Sensors
Tao, X., Lee, A., Limapichat, W., Dougherty, D. A., & MacKinnon, R. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185954 · Cited by 465
Allosteric Receptors after 30 Years
Changeux, J.-P., & Edelstein, S. J. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80616-9 · Cited by 431
Closing In on the Resting State of the Shaker K+ Channel
Pathak, M. M., Yarov-Yarovoy, V., Agarwal, G., Roux, B., Barth, P., Kohout, S., Tombola, F., & Isacoff, E. Y. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.023 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoppa, N. E., & Sigworth, F. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-342
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2195816025
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation of Shaker Potassium Channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.111.2.313
- The paper
- Schoppa, N. E., & Sigworth, F. J. (1998). Activation of Shaker Potassium Channels. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.111.2.313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.