The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energetic and Spatial Parameters for Gating of the Bacterial Large Conductance Mechanosensitive Channel, MscL
Open accessAbstract
MscL is multimeric protein that forms a large conductance mechanosensitive channel in the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. Since MscL is gated by tension transmitted through the lipid bilayer, we have been able to measure its gating parameters as a function of absolute tension. Using purified MscL reconstituted in liposomes, we recorded single channel currents and varied the pressure gradient (P) to vary the tension (T). The tension was calculated from P and the radius of curvature was obtained using video microscopy of the patch. The probability of being open (Po) has a steep sigmoidal dependence on T, with a midpoint (T1/2) of 11.8 dyn/cm. The maximal slope sensitivity of Po/Pc was 0.63 dyn/cm per e-fold. Assuming a Boltzmann distribution, the energy difference between the closed and fully open states in the unstressed membrane was ΔE = 18.6 kBT. If the mechanosensitivity arises from tension acting on a change of in-plane area (ΔA), the free energy, TΔA, would correspond to ΔA = 6.5 nm2. MscL is not a binary channel, but has four conducting states and a closed state. Most transition rates are independent of tension, but the rate-limiting step to opening is the transition between the closed state and the lowest conductance substate. This transition thus involves the greatest ΔA. When summed over all transitions, the in-plane area change from closed to fully open was 6 nm2, agreeing with the value obtained in the two-state analysis. Assuming a cylindrical channel, the dimensions of the (fully open) pore were comparable to ΔA. Thus, the tension dependence of channel gating is primarily one of increasing the external channel area to accommodate the pore of the smallest conducting state. The higher conducting states appear to involve conformational changes internal to the channel that don't involve changes in area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
TRP channels as cellular sensors
Clapham, D. E. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02196 · Cited by 2,779
Cox, C. D., Bae, C., Ziegler, L., Hartley, S., Nikolova-Krstevski, V., Rohde, P. R., Ng, C.-A., Sachs, F., Gottlieb, P. A., & Martinac, B. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10366 · Cited by 528
Self-citationNanomagnetic actuation of receptor-mediated signal transduction
Mannix, R. J., Kumar, S., Cassiola, F., Montoya-Zavala, M., Feinstein, E., Prentiss, M., & Ingber, D. E. (2008) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.418 · Cited by 323
Davis, M. J., Earley, S., Li, Y.-S., & Chien, S. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00053.2021 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Sukharev, S. I., Sigurdson, W. J., Kung, C., & Sachs, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-540
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W2172246975
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energetic and Spatial Parameters for Gating of the Bacterial Large Conductance Mechanosensitive Channel, MscL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.113.4.525
- The paper
- Sukharev, S. I., Sigurdson, W. J., Kung, C., & Sachs, F. (1999). Energetic and Spatial Parameters for Gating of the Bacterial Large Conductance Mechanosensitive Channel, MscL. The Journal of General Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.113.4.525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.