The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments.
Abstract
Gating current (Ig) has been studied in relation to inactivation of Na channels. No component of Ig has the time course of inactivation; apparently little or no charge movement is associated with this step. Inactivation nonetheless affects Ig by immobilizing about two-thirds of gating charge. Immobilization can be followed by measuring ON charge movement during a pulse and comparing it to OFF charge after the pulse. The OFF:ON ratio is near 1 for a pulse so short that no inactivation occurs, and the ratio drops to about one-third with a time course that parallels inactivation. Other correlations between inactivation and immobilization are that: (a) they have the same voltage dependence; (b) charge movement recovers with the time coures of recovery from inactivation. We interpret this to mean that the immobilized charge returns slowly to "off" position with the time course of recovery from inactivation, and that the small current generated is lost in base-line noise. At -150 mV recover is very rapid, and the immobilized charge forms a distinct slow component of current as it returns to off position. After destruction of inactivation by pronase, there is no immobilization of charge. A model is presented in which inactivation gains its voltage dependence by coupling to the activation gate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interaction of Tetraethylammonium Ion Derivatives with the Potassium Channels of Giant Axons
Armstrong, C. M. (1971) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.58.4.413 · Cited by 929
Self-citation
Cited by
Intrinsically disordered protein
Dunker, A. K., Lawson, J. D., Brown, C. J., Williams, R. M., Romero, P., Oh, J. S., Oldfield, C. J., Campen, A. M., Ratliff, C. M., Hipps, K. W., et al. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(00)00138-8 · Cited by 2,272
The action potential in mammalian central neurons
Bean, B. P. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2148 · Cited by 1,785
Biophysical and Molecular Mechanisms of Shaker Potassium Channel Inactivation
Hoshi, T., Zagotta, W. N., & Aldrich, R. W. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2122519 · Cited by 1,538
Molecular Structure and Physiological Function of Chloride Channels
Jentsch, T. J., Stein, V., Weinreich, F., & Zdebik, A. A. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2001 · Cited by 1,256
Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling
Uversky, V. N., Oldfield, C. J., & Dunker, A. K. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.747 · Cited by 847
Metadata
- Authors
- Armstrong, C. M., & Bezanilla, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of general physiology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1977-11-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-590
- ISSN
- 0022-1295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-7748
- OpenAlex
- W4253271002
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1085/jgp.70.5.567
- The paper
- Armstrong, C. M., & Bezanilla, F. (1977). Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments. The Journal of general physiology. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.70.5.567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.