Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Expanding the Realm of Microlensing Surveys with Difference Image Photometry

Open access
Tomaney, Austin B., Crotts, Arlin P. S.·1996·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We present a new technique for monitoring microlensing activity even in highly crowded fields, and use this technique to place limits on low-mass MACHOs in the haloes of M31 and the Galaxy. Unlike present Galactic microlensing surveys, we employ a technique in which a large fraction of the stellar sample is compressed into a single CCD field, rather than spread out in a way requiring many different telescope pointings. We implement the suggestion by Crotts [ApJ, 399, 143 (1993)] that crowded fields can be monitored by searching for changes in flux of variable objects by subtracting images of the same field, taken in time sequence, positionally registered, photometrically normalized, then subtracted from one another (or a sequence average). The present work tackles the most difficult part of this task, the adjustment of the point spread function among images in the sequence so that seeing variations play an insignificant role in determining the residual after subtraction. The interesting signal following this process consists of positive and negative point sources due to variable sources. The measurement of changes in flux determined in this way we dub difference image photometry [also called "pixel lensing"; Gould, preprint (1996)]. The matching of the image point spread function (PSF) is accomplished by a division of PSFs in Fourier space to produce a convolution kernel, in a manner explored for other reasons by Phillips & Davis [ASP Conf. Series 77, p. 297(1995)]. In practice, we find the application of this method is difficult in a typical telescope and wide field imaging camera due to a subtle interplay between the spatial variation of the PSF associated with the optical design and the inevitable time variability of the telescope focus. Such effects lead to complexities in matching the PSF over an entire frame. We demonstrate the realization of the difference image approach with two separate solutions to these problems-a software algorithm to determine the match of the spatially varying PSF between frames using a limited number of stars and also a simple optical corrector for a wide field imager to simplify the PSF matching function. The former solution yielded light curves of 139 variable sources detected in a 16' by 16' field in M31 over four nights on the KPNO 4-m telescope in 1994 and the latter yielded over 2000 sources detected over 50 nights in a single 11' by 11' field in M31 observed at the VATT 1.8-m telescope in 1995 using an optical corrector to facilitate the PSF matching problem. Of the KPNO sources discovered, 85 overlap with the VATT field and 23 of these were found to have a positional coincidence of < 1 to sources found in the VATT data. Light curves of the VATT objects over 14 nights confirm the short timescale variability of these sources. Although some fraction of the sources are bright enough to be considered resolved in the raw data more than half the sources are fainter than the surface brightness fluctuations associated with the unresolved stars in the galaxy and cannot be identified in the raw data. However, the light curves of these sources appear to be familiar variables such as Cepheids and eclipsing binaries. We assess the limitations and sensitivities of the techniques and demonstrate that we can achieve photometric errors of faint unresolved variables that are within a factor of three of the ultimate photon noise limit. Using this we show how the KPNO data over two good nights, and sensitive to ~10^6^ stars on a single CCD frame, yields 2σ optical depth limits of 5 x 10^-7^ for Galactic MACHOs in the mass range 2 x 10^-7^ M_sun_ (0.07 Earth masses). Given the estimate of the optical depth of the Galactic halo towards M31 of τ = 1 x 10^- 6^ (assuming a simple spherical halo), we can conclude that in two nights we have eliminated the possibility at the 95% confidence level that the Galactic halo is comprised of a single mass population of MACHOs in the sub-Earth mass range. Based on estimates of the M31 and Galactic MACHO τ = (5 - 10) x 10^-6^ we exclude the halo of these galaxies being composed of 8 x 10^-5^ M_sun_ MACHOs at the > 95% confidence level. These kind of techniques can extend present microlensing surveys into regimes not limited to resolved stars, which greatly expands the power of these surveys. Application to surveys of more general kinds of variability is clear. We also suggest other applications, such as to proper motion surveys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/118228

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Tomaney, A. B., & Crotts, A. P. S.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
1996-12
Volume
112
Pages
2872
ISSN
0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023502387
Cited by
269
References
0
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expanding the Realm of Microlensing Surveys with Difference Image Photometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/118228
The paper
Tomaney, A. B., & Crotts, A. P. S. (1996). Expanding the Realm of Microlensing Surveys with Difference Image Photometry. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/118228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.