Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 602

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry

Minnaert, M.·1941·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

In order to ascertain the exact meaning of the optical reciprocity principle, stated by Helmholtz, some simple idealized experiments are considered. By then applying this principle to the case of a scatter- ing surface, we find a general reciprocity law which is independent of the nature of the surface considered. Definite relations must, therefore, exist between the brightness of two points on the moon, if the lunar surface at these points has identical properties; a photometric test for this identity is thus obtained. From the work of Opik, Fessenkoff, and Bennett examples are selected in which similar lunar formations are found to have similar surface layers, and other examples in which the surfaces are found to be differ- ent. The reciprocity principle restricts the possible forms of the general law of illumination of the lunar surface. Some of the laws thus far proposed are incompatible with it

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/144279

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 602

Metadata

Authors
Minnaert, M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1941-05
Volume
93
Pages
403
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2024747153
Cited by
602
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/144279
The paper
Minnaert, M. (1941). The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/144279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.