Cited by 82Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Infrared observations of the galactic center. I - Nature of the compact sources

Becklin, E. E., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., Willner, S. P.·1978·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Photometry from 1.25 to 12 micrometers and spectrophotometry from 8 to 13 micrometers of the compact sources found in the galactic-center region are reported. In addition, revised 10 and new 20 micrometers maps with 2''.3 resolution are given. The nature of the compact sources is discussed. Some are best identified as stars or star clusters; the brightest source at 2 micrometers is probably a supergiant, and the infrared source near the nonthermal radio source is probably a stellar cluster with density greater than 1 million solar masses/cu pc. Other sources emit most of their luminosity at wavelengths of 10 micrometers and greater; this emission is probably from heated dust. One of the sources is observationally similar to extremely red OH/infrared stars. Other sources have luminosities and linear sizes similar to those of compact H II regions; emission from optically thin silicate dust is seen in these.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/155761

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central parsec of the GC hosts a compact star cluster (M⋆≃10^6 M⊙) where the majority of stars are old (age≳1 Gyr) with an average rotation vector in the same direction as the Galaxy.

    “The central parsec of the GC is known to host a compact star cluster ( M ⋆ ≃ 10 6 M ⊙ ) where the majority of stars are old (age ≳ 1 Gyr) that have an average rotation vector in the same direction as the Galaxy itself (Becklin et al. 1978; Launhardt et al. 2002; Genzel et al. 1996; Trippe et al. 2008; Schödel et al. 2009; von Fellenberg et al. 2022).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Becklin et al. 1978

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becklin, E. E., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., & Willner, S. P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1978-01
Volume
219
Pages
121
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2032105362
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Galactic Center, compact infrared sources, infrared photometry, infrared spectrophotometry, supergiants, star clusters, OH/IR stars, compact H II regions, nonthermal radio sources

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review