The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abundances of the heavy elements in the Magellanic Clouds. III - Interpretation of results
Abstract
This paper presents chemical and structural evolutionary models for the Magellanic Clouds assuming bimodal star formation and gas infall. The models are discussed in relation to the observed chemical abundances of the Clouds and are compared with our own Galaxy. The detailed abundances derived from previous work are investigated for any obvious trends with metallicity or differences compared with the Galaxy. Considering all the data, conclusions are drawn on the possible star formation histories of the Magellanic Clouds and the implications for our own Galaxy. The following conclusions were reached in this work. The interstellar medium (ISM) of the LMC has a mean metallicity 0.2 dex lower than the local Galactic ISM, and the metallicity of the SMC is 0.6 dex lower. However, the interstellar media of both the Magellanic Clouds and the Galaxy have significantly nonsolar elemental ratios. This is most evident when considering the lightest and the heaviest of the elements. The s-process appears to have been less effective at forming the heavy neutron- capture elements in the Magellanic Clouds than in the Galaxy. The r-process, on the other hand, appears to have been more effective. Of the light elements, carbon appears to be of normal abundance in the Cloud stars relative to the iron abundance, which is in contrast to the carbon abundances in the H II regions, which appear to be anomalously low. The overall distribution of the lightest elements in the Clouds shows a gradual falling off in the abundances, relative to the Sun, as the atomic number decreases. This is seen not to be the case when the abundances are compared with the local ISM, and suggests that the present ISM in the vicinity of the Sun is material that has fallen in from farther out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolution of isotope ratios in the Milky Way Galaxy
Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Umeda, H. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18621.x · Cited by 401
Stellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07021 · Cited by 312
A new synthetic model for asymptotic giant branch stars
Izzard, R. G., Tout, C. A., Karakas, A. I., & Pols, O. R. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07446.x · Cited by 304
Bland-Hawthorn, J., Sharma, S., Tepper-Garcia, T., Binney, J., Freeman, K. C., Hayden, M. R., Kos, J., De Silva, G. M., Ellis, S., Lewis, G. F., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz217 · Cited by 224
On the origin of fluorine in the Milky Way
Renda, A., Fenner, Y., Gibson, B. K., Karakas, A. I., Lattanzio, J. C., Campbell, S., Chieffi, A., Cunha, K., & Smith, V. V. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08215.x · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, S. C., & Dopita, M. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 384
- Pages
- 508
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2082929737
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abundances of the heavy elements in the Magellanic Clouds. III - Interpretation of results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/170893
- The paper
- Russell, S. C., & Dopita, M. A. (1992). Abundances of the heavy elements in the Magellanic Clouds. III - Interpretation of results. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/170893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.